Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377644›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2020

Identification of tumor-associated macrophage subsets that are associated with breast cancer prognosis.

Elisabeth Strack, P Alexander Rolfe, Annika F Fink, Katrin Bankov, Tobias Schmid, Christine Solbach, Rajkumar Savai, Weixiao Sha, Leon Pradel, Sylvia Hartmann and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Peritumoral macrophages recruit eosinophils to promote antitumor immune responses in breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisabeth StrackFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry I, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
P Alexander RolfeEMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Billerica, Massachusetts.
Annika F FinkFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry I, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Katrin BankovDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tobias SchmidFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry I, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christine SolbachDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Rajkumar SavaiMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1538-2091
Weixiao ShaMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Leon PradelMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Sylvia HartmannDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Bernhard BrüneFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry I, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Andreas WeigertFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry I, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-1952
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMerck (Germany) · DEOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women, demanding new treatment options. With the advent of immune checkpoint blockade, immunotherapy emerged as a treatment option. In addition to lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages exert a significant, albeit controversial, impact on tumor development. Pro-inflammatory macrophages are thought to hinder, whereas anti-inflammatory macrophages promote tumor growth. However, molecular markers to identify prognostic macrophage populations remain elusive.

methodsWe isolated two macrophage subsets, from 48 primary human breast tumors, distinguished by the expression of CD206. Their transcriptomes were analyzed via RNA-Seq, and potential prognostic macrophage markers were validated by PhenOptics in tissue microarrays of patients with invasive breast cancer.

resultsNormal human breast tissue contained mainly CD206

conclusionOur data highlight the heterogeneity of tumor-infiltrating macrophages and suggest the use of multiple phenotypic markers to predict the impact of macrophage subpopulations on cancer prognosis. We identified novel macrophage markers that correlate with the survival of patients with invasive mammary carcinoma.

Indexed as

breast cancerflow cytometrymacrophagetranscriptometumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33377644
PMCPMC7719284
OpenAlexW3113003370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.