Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377545›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2021

Urban sprawl into Natura 2000 network over Europe.

Elena D Concepción

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Representativeness of the Natura 2000 network for preserving plant biodiversity in the European Union.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Threats to and management of Natura 2000 protected areas relative to agricultural practices.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elena D ConcepciónBiogeography and Global Change Department, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Spanish National Research Council, MNCN-CSIC, C/Serrano 115 bis, Madrid, E-28006, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-6902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban growth is a major threat to biodiversity conservation at the global scale. Its impacts are expected to be especially detrimental when it sprawls into the landscape and reaches sites of high conservation value due to the species and ecosystems they host, such as protected areas. I analyzed the degree of urbanization (i.e., urban cover and growth rate) from 2006 to 2015 in protected sites in the Natura 2000 network, which, according to the Habitats and Birds Directives, harbor species and habitats of high conservation concern in Europe. I used data on the degree of land imperviousness from COPERNICUS to calculate and compare urban covers and growth rates inside and outside Natura 2000. I also analyzed the relationships of urban cover and growth rates with a set of characteristics of Natura sites. Urban cover inside Natura 2000 was 10 times lower than outside (0.4% vs. 4%) throughout the European Union. However, the rates of urban growth were slightly higher inside than outside Natura 2000 (4.8% vs. 3.9%), which indicates an incipient urban sprawl inside the network. In general, Natura sites affected most by urbanization were those surrounded by densely populated areas (i.e., urban clusters) that had a low number of species or habitats of conservation concern, albeit some member states had high urban cover or growth rate or both in protected sites with a large number of species or habitats of high conservation value. Small Natura sites had more urban cover than large sites, but urban growth rates were highest in large Natura sites. Natura 2000 is protected against urbanization to some extent, but there is room for improvement. Member states must enact stricter legal protection and control law enforcement to halt urban sprawl into protected areas under the greatest pressure from urban sprawl (i.e., close to urban clusters). Such actions are particularly needed in Natura sites with high urban cover and growth rates and areas where urbanization is affecting small Natura sites of high conservation value, which are especially vulnerable and concentrated in the Mediterranean region.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityBirdsEurope2030 Agenda Sustainable Development GoalsAichi targetsáreas prioritarias para la conservaciónBirds and Habitats Directivesconservation priority areasConvenio sobre la Diversidad BiológicaConvention of Biological DiversityDirectivas de Aves y Hábitatsespecies y hábitats prioritariosEstrategia de la UE sobre BiodiversidadEU Biodiversity Strategyobjetivos de AichiObjetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible de la Agenda 2030priority species and habitatsurbanizaciónurbanization

Identifiers

PMID33377545
PMCPMC8419961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.