ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Role of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Evaluation of Cerebral Metabolic Status Before and After Carotid Endarterectomy/Thromboendarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Asymptomatic Critical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Somatosensory cortex neuronal integrity is altered after stroke.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Correlation between Selection of Time Window for Acute Cerebral Infarction and Efficacy of Intravascular Stent Implantation.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Stenting for elderly patients with internal carotid artery stenosis: analysis of clinical efficacy.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relative efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA)/thromboendarterectomy (TEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) already has been compared in randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis, but only limited data exist describing the status of cerebral metabolism before and after these interventions. The aim of the present study was to compare metabolic changes before and after treatment of carotid stenosis and assess their potential clinical implications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with asymptomatic unilateral critical internal CAS were imaged with proton 3T magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-MRS) because the technique is more sensitive than regular magnetic resonance imaging for detection of the early signs of ischemic events. Abnormal metabolite ratios detected with H-MRS may precede actual morphological changes associated with hypoperfusion as well as reperfusion changes. Ipsilateral and contralateral middle cerebral artery vascular territories were both evaluated before and after vascular intervention. H-MRS was performed within 24 h before and after surgery. Correlations in the metabolic data from H-MRS for N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA)+N-acetylaspartylglutamate, creatinine (Cr)+phosphocreatinine, and phosphocholine+glycerophosphocholine (Cho) were sought. RESULTS H-MRS voxels from 11 subjects were analyzed. Values for dCho/CrI, dCho/CrC and Cho/Naal (P<0.001) were significantly higher ipsilaterally than contralaterally. Ratios for dNaa/ChoC and Cho/NaaC were significantly higher on the non-operated side (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS H-MRS may be helpful for assessment of patients with CAS, particularly because unlike other modalities, it reveals postoperative changes in metabolic brain status. Initial results indicate the important role of perioperative neuroprotective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.