Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377272›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2021

People with intellectual disability in Ireland are still dying young.

Anne Doyle, Michael O'Sullivan, Sarah Craig, Roy McConkey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Menopause on the Mental Health of Women With an Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne DoyleNational Health Information Systems, Health Research Board, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael O'SullivanNational Health Information Systems, Health Research Board, Dublin, Ireland.
Sarah CraigNational Health Information Systems, Health Research Board, Dublin, Ireland.
Roy McConkeyInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-7402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with intellectual disability die younger than their non-disabled peers. In recent years, greater attention has been paid to closing the gap. However, evidence that this is being achieved is limited by the dearth of longitudinal, national data.

methodOver 4,000 decedents identified in the Irish National Intellectual Disability Database from 2001 to 2016 were compared to deaths in the general population based on age and gender profiles using death rates and standardised mortality ratios. A binary logistic regression analysis also identified the characteristics of persons who had a higher risk of dying.

resultsIrish people with intellectual disability die younger and have a higher rate of death than their non-disabled peers. Nor has the gap between their mortality and that of the general population closed in recent years.

conclusionsMore concentrated effort is needed in Ireland on promoting equitable access to health services for people with intellectual disability.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityLife ExpectancyDatabases, FactualHumansIrelanddeaths

Identifiers

PMID33377272
PMCPMC8359186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.