Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377172›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2021

Mammographic density as an image-based biomarker of therapy response in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer patients.

Ida Skarping, Daniel Förnvik, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Hanna Sartor, Per Hall, Sophia Zackrisson, Signe Borgquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tumor immune microenvironment components and the other markers can predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ida SkarpingDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. ida.skarping@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-8649
Daniel FörnvikDepartment of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-7624
Uffe Heide-JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hanna SartorDepartment of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-5199
Per HallDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5640-9126
Sophia ZackrissonDepartment of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-3882
Signe BorgquistDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Barngatan 4, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-8893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersonalized cancer treatment requires predictive biomarkers, including image-based biomarkers. Breast cancer (BC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are in a clinically vulnerable situation with the tumor present. This study investigated whether mammographic density (MD), assessed pre-NACT, is predictive of pathological complete response (pCR).

methodsA total of 495 BC patients receiving NACT in Sweden 2005-2019 were included, merged from two different cohorts. Cohort 1 was retrospectively collected (n = 295) and cohort 2 was prospectively collected (n = 200). Mammograms were scored for MD pre-NACT according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 5th Edition. The association between MD and accomplishing pCR post-NACT was analyzed using logistic regression models-for the whole cohort, stratified by menopausal status, and in different St. Gallen surrogate subtypes.

resultsIn comparison to patients with low MD (BI-RADS a), the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of accomplishing pCR following NACT was on a descending scale: 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.57), 0.38 (95% CI 0.14-1.02), and 0.32 (95% CI 0.09-1.08) for BI-RADS b, c, and d, respectively. For premenopausal patients selectively, the corresponding point estimates were lower, although wider CIs: 0.31 (95% CI 0.06-1.62), 0.24 (95% CI 0.04-1.27), and 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.88). Subgroup analyses based on BC subtypes resulted in imprecise estimates, i.e., wide CIs.

conclusionsIt seemed as though patients with higher MD at baseline were less likely to reach pCR after NACT-a finding more pronounced in premenopausal women. Larger multicenter studies are needed to enable analyses and interpretation for different BC subtypes.

Indexed as

Breast DensityNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedOdds RatioPremenopauseProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSwedenBiomarkersBreast cancerBreast densityMammographyNeoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33377172
PMCPMC7870759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.