Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377141›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2021

Prognostic relevance of clinical and molecular risk factors in children with high-risk medulloblastoma treated in the phase II trial PNET HR+5.

Christelle Dufour, Stephanie Foulon, Anne Geoffray, Julien Masliah-Planchon, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Valerie Bernier-Chastagner, Laetitia Padovani, Léa Guerrini-Rousseau, Cecile Faure-Conter, Celine Icher and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recent Advances in Pediatric Medulloblastoma.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Medulloblastoma: Current Perspectives and Recent Advances.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Christelle DufourDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-8077
Stephanie FoulonDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Anne GeoffrayDepartment of Pediatric Imaging, Fondation Lenval Children's Hospital, Nice, France.
Julien Masliah-PlanchonINSERM U830, Laboratory of Translational Research in Pediatric Oncology, SIREDO Pediatric Oncology Center, Curie Institute, Paris, France.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Valerie Bernier-ChastagnerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Alexis Vautrin Cancer Center, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Laetitia PadovaniDepartment of Radiotherapy, CHU La Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Léa Guerrini-RousseauDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Cecile Faure-ConterDepartment of Pediatry, Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie pédiatrique, Lyon, France.
Celine IcherDepartment of pediatrics, Bordeaux university hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Anne-Isabelle BertozziDepartment of Pediatric Onco-hematology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Pierre LeblondPediatric Oncology Unit, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7088-2614
Tasnime AkbaralyDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Franck BourdeautSIREDO Pediatric Oncology Center, Curie Institute, Paris, France.
Nicolas AndréDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, La Timone Children's Hospital, Marseille, France.
Celine ChappéDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Pascale SchneiderPediatric Hemato-Oncology Department, University Hospital, Rouen, Rouen, France.
Emilie De CarliDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital, Angers, France.
Pascal ChastagnerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital, Nancy, France.
Claire BergerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
Julien LejeunePediatric Onco-Hematology Unit, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
Christine SolerHematology Department, Hôpital l'Archet, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Natacha Entz-WerléPediatric Onco-Hematology Unit, CHU of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Marie-Bernadette DelisleDepartments of Pathology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRFondation Lenval · FRInstitut Curie · FRInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk medulloblastoma is defined by the presence of metastatic disease and/or incomplete resection and/or unfavorable histopathology and/or tumors with MYC amplification. We aimed to assess the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and define the molecular characteristics associated with PFS in patients aged 5-19 years with newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma treated according to the phase II trial PNET HR+5.

methodsAll children received postoperative induction chemotherapy (etoposide and carboplatin), followed by 2 high-dose thiotepa courses (600 mg/m2) with hematological stem cell support. At the latest 45 days after the last stem cell rescue, patients received risk-adapted craniospinal radiation therapy. Maintenance treatment with temozolomide was planned to start between 1-3 months after the end of radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS. Outcome and safety analyses were per protocol (all patients who received at least one dose of induction chemotherapy).

resultsFifty-one patients (median age, 8 y; range, 5-19) were enrolled. The median follow-up was 7.1 years (range: 3.4-9.0). The 3 and 5-year PFS with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were 78% (65-88) and 76% (63-86), and the 3 and 5-year OS were 84% (72-92) and 76% (63-86), respectively. Medulloblastoma subtype was a statistically significant prognostic factor (P-value = 0.039) with large-cell/anaplastic being of worse prognosis, as well as a molecular subgroup (P-value = 0.012) with sonic hedgehog (SHH) and group 3 being of worse prognosis than wingless (WNT) and group 4. Therapy was well tolerated.

conclusionsThis treatment based on high-dose chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy resulted in a high survival rate in children with newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsMedulloblastomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalHedgehog ProteinsHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsHedgehog Proteinschildrenhigh-risk medulloblastomaphase II trial

Identifiers

PMID33377141
PMCPMC8248855
OpenAlexW3114953172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.