Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33377029›Full record

ArticleSTAR protocols2020

Using Machine Learning and Targeted Mass Spectrometry to Explore the Methyl-Lys Proteome.

Francois Charih, James R Green, Kyle K Biggar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in STAR protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francois CharihInstitute of Biochemistry and Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
James R GreenSystems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5BS, Canada.
Kyle K BiggarInstitute of Biochemistry and Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
Carleton University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein lysine methylation mediates a variety of biological processes, and their dysregulation has been established to play pivotal roles in human disease. A number of these sites constitute attractive drug targets. However, systematic identification of methylation sites is challenging and resource intensive. Here, we present a protocol combining MethylSight, a machine learning model trained to identify promising lysine methylation sites, and mass spectrometry for subsequent validation. Our approach can reduce the time and investment required to identify novel methylation sites. For complete information on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Biggar et al. (2020).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsForecastingHumansLysineMachine LearningMass SpectrometryMethylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareLysineProteome

Identifiers

PMID33377029
PMCPMC7757287
OpenAlexW3094180207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.