Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376992›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2020

Inclusion of the Acetabular Labrum Reduces Simulated Range of Motion of the Hip Compared With Bone Contact Models.

Penny R Atkins, Takehito Hananouchi, Andrew E Anderson, Stephen K Aoki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Penny R AtkinsDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
Takehito HananouchiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
Andrew E AndersonDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
Stephen K AokiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
University of Utah · USOsaka Sangyo University · JP

Funding

Musculoskeletal and Finite Element Modeling of Femoroacetabular ImpingementR21AR063844 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2014
$349k
Tandem Instrumented Treadmill for Accurate Assessment of in-vivo Joint KineticsS10RR026565 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2010 to 2010
$222k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR026565NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR063844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether inclusion of the acetabular labrum affects the maximum range of motion (ROM) during simulation of the flexion-adduction-internal rotation impingement examination.

methodsThree-dimensional surface reconstructions of the femur, hemi-pelvis, and labrum from computed tomography arthrography images of 19 participants were used to simulate maximum ROM during the flexion-adduction-internal rotation examination. Simulations were conducted for positions between 70° and 110° flexion and 0° and 20° adduction at 10° increments to measure maximum internal rotation and the position of contact between the femur and acetabular rim (bone-to-bone) or the femur and labrum (bone-to-labrum). Internal rotation angles and clock-face position values were compared between the 2 contact scenarios for each position.

resultsThe ROM in the bone-to-labrum contact model was significantly less than that of the bone-to-bone contact model for all evaluated positions (

conclusionsInclusion of the anatomy of the acetabular labrum in collision models used to simulate impingement examinations reduced the internal rotation ROM by approximately 20° and increased variability in the location of contact relative to the acetabular rim. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While standard bone-to-bone contact ROM simulations may be informative with respect to the relative change in ROM based on a surgical intervention (e.g., pre- and post-osteochondroplasty for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement), they may not accurately represent the clinical ROM of the joint or the kinematic position at which damage may occur due to shape mismatch between the femur and acetabulum.

Identifiers

PMID33376992
PMCPMC7754612
OpenAlexW3092176971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.