Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376985›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2020

Paradoxical lesions, plasticity and active inference.

Noor Sajid, Thomas Parr, Andrea Gajardo-Vidal, Cathy J Price, Karl J Friston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bistable perception, precision and neuromodulation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Generative Models for Active Vision.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noor SajidWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Thomas ParrWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-5743
Andrea Gajardo-VidalWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3946-0795
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Karl J FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1Wellcome Trust 205103/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paradoxical lesions are secondary brain lesions that ameliorate functional deficits caused by the initial insult. This effect has been explained in several ways; particularly by the reduction of functional inhibition, or by increases in the excitatory-to-inhibitory synaptic balance within perilesional tissue. In this article, we simulate how and when a modification of the excitatory-inhibitory balance triggers the reversal of a functional deficit caused by a primary lesion. For this, we introduce

Indexed as

active inferencelearningparadoxical lesionsplasticitystructure–function relationship

Identifiers

PMID33376985
PMCPMC7750943
OpenAlexW3094945647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.