Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376932›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Georgios Tsikandylakis, Kristian R L Mortensen, Kirill Gromov, Anders Troelsen, Henrik Malchau, Maziar Mohaddes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparative studyWorld journal of orthopedics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgios TsikandylakisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-075X
Kristian R L MortensenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8174-4965
Kirill GromovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8114-5193
Anders TroelsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0132-8182
Henrik MalchauDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-2441
Maziar MohaddesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-9054
University of Copenhagen · DKSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cups are more frequently revised than stems after uncemented total hip arthroplasty, which warrants the development of cup surfaces that provide long-lasting, stable fixation. Large heads have become popular with the aim of reducing dislocation rates, but they generate greater frictional torque that may compromise cup fixation. We aimed to investigate (1) if a novel porous titanium surface provides superior cup fixation when compared with a porous plasma spray (PPS) surface and (2) if the use of the largest possible head compromises cup fixation when compared with a 32-mm head.

methodsNinety-six patients were randomized to receive either a cup with a porous titanium coating (PTC) or a cup with PPS. A second randomization was performed to either the largest possible (36 to 44-mm) or a 32-mm head in metal-on-vitamin-E-infused polyethylene bearings. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) examinations were obtained postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome was proximal cup migration when comparing the 2 cup surfaces and also when comparing the largest possible head with the 32-mm head. The patients were followed for 2 years.

resultsThe median (and interquartile range) proximal cup migration was 0.15 mm (0.02 to 0.32 mm) for the PTC cup and 0.21 mm (0.11 to 0.34 mm) for the PPS cup. The largest possible head had a proximal cup migration of 0.15 mm (0.09 to 0.31 mm), and the 32-mm head had a proximal cup migration of 0.20 mm (0.04 to 0.35 mm). There were no significant differences between the cup surface (p = 0.378) or the head size (p = 0.693) groups.

conclusionsEarly cup fixation was not superior with the novel PTC cup; the use of the largest possible head (36 to 44 mm) did not compromise early cup fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID33376932
PMCPMC7757840
OpenAlexW3112701122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.