ArticleACS omega2020
Effect of Surface Modifications on Cellular Uptake of Gold Nanorods in Human Primary Cells and Established Cell Lines.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gold Nanorod-Radiopharmaceutical Conjugates for Nuclear Medicine Theranostics: A Methodological and Multiscale Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Environmental protein corona on nanoplastics altered the responses of skin keratinocytes and fibroblast cells to the particles.Journal of hazardous materials · 2025Article
- Sinapic Acid-Conjugated Gadolinium Complexes as Anti-Inflammatory Theranostic Agents That Target Transforming Growth Factor β‑Activated Kinase 1 (TAK1).ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Influence of branched ligand architectures on nanoparticle interactions with lipid bilayers.Nanoscale · 2025Article
- Quantifying Intracellular Nanoparticle Distributions with Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Microscopy.ACS nano · 2023Article
- Targeting Ultrasmall Gold Nanoparticles with cRGD Peptide Increases the Uptake and Efficacy of Cytotoxic Payload.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Understanding the Phagocytosis of Particles: the Key for Rational Design of Vaccines and Therapeutics.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Review
- Endocytosis of abiotic nanomaterials and nanobiovectors: Inhibition of membrane trafficking.Nano today · 2021Review
- Synthesis of Silica Nanoparticles with Physical Encapsulation of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Dyes and Their Tannic Acid Coating.ACS omega · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocytosis is a cellular process in which substances are engulfed by the cellular membrane and budded off inside the cells to form vesicles. It plays key roles in controlling nutritional component uptake, immune responses, and other biological functions. A comprehensive understanding of endocytosis gives insights into such physiological functions and informs the design of medical nanodevices that need to enter cells. So far, endocytosis has been studied mostly using established cell lines. However, the established cell lines generally originate from cancer cells or are transformed from normal cells into immortalized cells. Therefore, primary cells may give us more reliable information about the endocytosis process of nanoparticles into cells. In this research, we studied the uptake of gold nanorods (AuNRs) with four different surface modifications (anionic/cationic polymers and anionic/cationic silica) by two kinds of primary cells (human monocyte-derived macrophages and human umbilical vein endothelial cells) and two kinds of established cell lines (HeLa cells and RAW 264.7 cells). We found that the surface properties of AuNRs affected their cellular uptake, and the cationic surface tended was advantageous for uptake, but it depended on the cell types. Control experiments using inhibitors of representative endocytosis pathways (macropinocytosis, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and caveolae-mediated endocytosis) indicated that primary cells had a dominant uptake pathway for internalization of the AuNRs, whereas the established cell lines had multiple pathways. Our results provide us with novel insights into cellular uptake of AuNRs in that they depend not only on surface characters of the nanoparticles but also cell types, such as primary cells and established cell lines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.