ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2021
Jingshu Keli for treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: The first multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of manufactured Chinese herbal formula for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- An Integrated Strategy for Decoding Bioactive Components and Mechanism of Jingtong Granules: Chemical Characterization, Network Analysis, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy With Cervical Posterior Decompression Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique: A Single Center Retrospective Series of 20 Patients.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of manufactured Chinese herbal formula for cervical radiculopathy: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Preoperative Coronal MRI-Guided Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Electroacupuncture Attenuates Neuropathic Pain in a Rat Model of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: Involvement of Spinal Cord Synaptic Plasticity.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic foraminotomy and diskectomy combined with piezosurgery for treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with neuropathic radicular pain.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Biomechanics of a novel artificial cervical vertebra from an in vivo caprine cervical spine non-fusion model.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022Article
- Editorial: Fresh perspectives on established ideas.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Article
- The Role of Digital X-Ray in Curative Effect and Nursing Evaluation of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJingshu Keli (or Jingshu granules), a traditional Chinese medicine, are widely used for treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy in China; however, no randomized, double-blind, controlled study has verified their effectiveness. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jingshu Keli for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy in a randomized controlled trial.
designFrom August 2015 to July 2017, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 13 large- and medium-sized hospitals in China. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 360 and 120 patients were initially enrolled in the Jingshu and control groups, respectively; 386 patients completed the study, with 299 in the Jingshu group and 87 in the control group. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main index for evaluating the curative effect was the pain score on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100 points).
methodsAll patients were administered a bag of Jingshu Keli or placebo 3 times a day for 4 weeks, and were interviewed at the second and fourth weeks. The decrease in pain scores and rate of change in pain scores after treatment were calculated, related laboratory indices were reviewed, and adverse reactions were recorded.
resultsIn the Per Protocol Set (PPS) analysis, the baseline pain VAS scores in the control and Jingshu groups were 49.31 ± 6.97 and 50.06 ± 7.33, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). While there were no differences at 2 weeks between groups, at four weeks the pain VAS scores in the control and Jingshu groups decreased by 12.86 ± 13.45 and 22.72 ± 15.08, respectively relative to the values at baseline, with significant group differences (P < 0.0001). While there were similar significant differences between the groups (P < 0.0001) in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) analyses neither group achieved the minimal clinically important difference at any time point.
conclusionsJingshu Keli are effective for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL STATEMENT: This is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that confirmed the clinical efficacy and safety of Jingshu Keli for treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, which can provide evidence for clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.