ArticleCureus2020
Assessment of Different Risk Factors Among Adult Cardiac Patients at a Single Cardiac Center in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study on Assessment of Depression in Cardiac Patients.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2023Article
- Dyslipidemia and its associated factors among adult cardiac patients at Ambo university referral hospital, Oromia region, west Ethiopia.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Saudi Heart Association Guidelines on Best Practices in the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has remained the leading cause of death in the last 15 years and is one of the main health problems in Saudi Arabia. Our study aims to assess the prevalence of different CVD risk factors and correlate them among King Faisal Cardiac Center patients in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using a convenient sampling technique. Data were collected by interviewing adult patients admitted to King Faisal Cardiac Center and diagnosed with hemodynamically stable cardiac disease. We excluded patients with multiple medical conditions that contribute to acute mental disorders. The sample size was calculated to be 200 patients. Results Overall, 163 patients completed the survey. The majority of the participants (49.1%) were between 46-65 years of age, males, non-smokers, and had more than 11 children. Diabetes was found to be the most common risk factor (66.3%). Most participants had mild to moderate anxiety (63.8%) and depression (66.9%). Most of the patients (51.5%) have a high 10-year risk of developing CVD, followed by moderate and low risk (33.1% and 15.3%, respectively). In our study, a high 10-year risk of CVD was significantly associated with age between 46-80 years with a p-value=0.002, male gender with a p-value=0.007, cigarette smoking with a p-value=0.031, and diabetes with a p-value=0.035. Conclusion The study demonstrated a high prevalence of the following CVD risk factors: age, male gender, immobility, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. In addition, a significant association was found between high 10-year risk of CVD and age, gender, smoking, number of children, and diabetes with a p-value<0.05. No significant association was found in the other risk factors such as obesity, body mass index (BMI), immobility, caregiver, dyslipidemia, depression, and anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.