Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376461›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2020

The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions.

Verena Klusmann, Nanna Notthoff, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Anne Blawert, Martina Gabrian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reframing Communication about Fall Prevention Programs to Increase Older Adults' Intentions to Participate.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Scaling Down the PGCM Scale to Assess Views on Ageing More Efficiently: Finding a New Alternative.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Views on ageing: a lifespan perspective.European journal of ageing · 2020
    Review
  19. Current directions in views on ageing.European journal of ageing · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Verena KlusmannDepartment of Psychology, Psychological Assessment & Health Psychology, University of Konstanz, Box 47, 78457 Constance, Germany.
Nanna NotthoffFaculty of Sport Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Ann-Kristin BeyerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anne BlawertDepartment of Social Medicine and Prevention, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Martina GabrianDFG Scientific Network Images of Aging, Constance/Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 instruments which were categorised along eight dimensions. The majority of measures focus on explicit cognitions about people's own age and ageing or other (older) people. A substantial amount of tools account for the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of views on ageing, i.e. the idea that ageing is accompanied by both gains and losses in several different domains. To some extent, measures reflect that ageing is a long-term process and that views on ageing are malleable, rather than just stable traits. Cluster analysis revealed heterogeneity in instruments regarding the dimensions of

Indexed as

Age stereotypesAssessmentReviewSelf-perceptions of ageingSubjective ageingViews on ageing

Identifiers

PMID33376461
PMCPMC7752934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.