Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376420›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2020

REAC Neuromodulation Treatments in Depression, Anxiety and Stress. A Comparative Retrospective Study.

Ana Rita Pinheiro Barcessat, Marina Nolli Bittencourt, Rebeca Góes Gonçalves, Ana Vitoria Goncalves de Oliveira Cruz, José Alfredo Coelho Pereira, Fabio Augusto Bechelli, Arianna Rinaldi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Rita Pinheiro Barcessat *Health and Biological Sciences Department, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-6435
Marina Nolli Bittencourt *Department of Nursing, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1660-3418
Rebeca Góes GonçalvesHealth and Biological Sciences Department, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-9560
Ana Vitoria Goncalves de Oliveira CruzHealth and Biological Sciences Department, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-4788
José Alfredo Coelho PereiraResearch Department, Rinaldi Fontani Foundation, Florence, Italy.
Fabio Augusto BechelliInternational Scientific Society of Neuro Psycho Physical Optimization with REAC Technology, Brazilian Branch, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arianna RinaldiResearch Department, Rinaldi Fontani Foundation, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-6624
Universidade Federal do Amapá · BRDeutsches Historisches Institut Rom · ITUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of two different modalities of administration of the neuro psycho physical optimization (NPPO) neuromodulation treatment, applied with radio electric asymmetric conveyer (REAC) biotechnology devices. Both the modalities are aimed at improving the strategies to deal with and optimize the allostatic response to environmental stressors and exposome. This allows to reduce the dysfunctional adaptive behavior patterns, which underlie many neuropsychological symptoms and pathologies, and to improve the symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom a population of subjects experiencing at least two of the three symptoms depression, anxiety and stress, the selection of pre and post-treatment Depression, Anxiety, Stress 21 items scale (DASS 21) data was made proceeding with a reverse chronological recruitment mechanism, until reaching 150 subjects for each of the 2 groups. The first group was treated with the neuro psycho physical optimization treatment (NPPO), which is the punctiform modality of administration on the auricle pavilion, and the second group was treated with the neuro psycho physical optimization treatment, which is the area modality of administration applied by the planar probe on the cervicobrachial area (NPPO-CB).

resultsThe Wilcoxon signs test confirmed the differences in scores in pre and post-treatment DASS-21. The comparison between the two groups data and the comparison across groups data showed that NPPO and NPPO-CB have the same efficacy in reducing the symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, after a single treatment cycle. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05. DISCUSSION: This is the first efficacy descriptive comparison between the two different modalities of administration of the NPPO treatment, as different options for the same clinical indication.

Indexed as

behavioral disordersDASS-21neuromodulationnoninvasive neurostimulation

Identifiers

PMID33376420
PMCPMC7762445
OpenAlexW3117689545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.