ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2020
Screening and Identifying Cisplatin-Related Gene Mutations in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPlatinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with LUSC, but cisplatin resistance greatly restricts its clinical application. Therefore, it is particularly important to screen the predominant LUSC population using biomarkers.
methodsData for 15 LUSC cell lines were downloaded from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) Project database to screen for mutations related to cisplatin susceptibility. We conducted whole-exome sequencing (WES) of tumors from 58 LUSC patients from Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology. Subsequently, the clinical prognostic value of these mutations was verified by using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUSC cohort and our cohort (n=58).
resultsBased on the cisplatin sensitivity data of GDSC-LUSC and survival analysis of TCGA-LUSC and Local-LUSC cohorts, we found that only mutation of IGF2R was associated with cisplatin sensitivity, better overall survival [OS; P=0.04, HR (95% CI): 0.42 (0.23-0.78)] and progression-free survival [PFS; P =0.016, HR (95% CI): 0.26 (0.12-0.59)]. However, there were no significant differences in the frequencies of gene mutations between the IGF2R-mutant (IGF2R-MT) and IGF2R-wild-type (IGF2R-WT) groups. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) indicated enhanced intracellular detoxification and decreased abnormal signaling activity to reverse cisplatin tolerance in the IGF2R-MT group.
conclusionThe results suggest that IGF2R mutations are a potential biomarker for screening LUSC patients suitable for cisplatin treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.