Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376244›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Environmental patterns of brown moss- and Sphagnum-associated microbial communities.

Alexander Tøsdal Tveit, Andrea Kiss, Matthias Winkel, Fabian Horn, Tomáš Hájek, Mette Marianne Svenning, Dirk Wagner, Susanne Liebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tissue-Specific Differential Distribution of Cell Wall Epitopes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander Tøsdal TveitUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Tromsø, Norway.
Andrea KissGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Matthias WinkelGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Fabian HornGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Tomáš HájekUniversity of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Mette Marianne SvenningUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Tromsø, Norway.
Dirk WagnerGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Susanne LiebnerGFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Potsdam, Germany. susanne.liebner@gfz-potsdam.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Northern peatlands typically develop through succession from fens dominated by the moss family Amblystegiaceae to bogs dominated by the moss genus Sphagnum. How the different plants and abiotic environmental conditions provided in Amblystegiaceae and Sphagnum peat shape the respective moss associated microbial communities is unknown. Through a large-scale molecular and biogeochemical study spanning Arctic, sub-Arctic and temperate regions we assessed how the endo- and epiphytic microbial communities of natural northern peatland mosses relate to peatland type (Sphagnum and Amblystegiaceae), location, moss taxa and abiotic environmental variables. Microbial diversity and community structure were distinctly different between Amblystegiaceae and Sphagnum peatlands, and within each of these two peatland types moss taxon explained the largest part of microbial community variation. Sphagnum and Amblystegiaceae shared few (< 1% of all operational taxonomic units (OTUs)) but strikingly abundant (up to 65% of relative abundance) OTUs. This core community overlapped by one third with the Sphagnum-specific core-community. Thus, the most abundant microorganisms in Sphagnum that are also found in all the Sphagnum plants studied, are the same OTUs as those few shared with Amblystegiaceae. Finally, we could confirm that these highly abundant OTUs were endophytes in Sphagnum, but epiphytes on Amblystegiaceae. We conclude that moss taxa and abiotic environmental variables associate with particular microbial communities. While moss taxon was the most influential parameter, hydrology, pH and temperature also had significant effects on the microbial communities. A small though highly abundant core community is shared between Sphagnum and Amblystegiaceae.

Indexed as

BiodiversityWetlandsArctic RegionsBryopsidaMicrobiotaSphagnopsida

Identifiers

PMID33376244
PMCPMC7772339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.