ArticleScientific reports2020
Demographic analyses of a new sample of haploid genomes from a Swedish population of Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A cosmopolitan inversion facilitates seasonal adaptation in overwintering Drosophila.Genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Ecology and Diversity of UrbanEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- High-quality genome assembly of Chironomus riparius and its population history in European populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Natural Selection in Transcription Factor-DNA Interaction Motifs: A Comparative and Population Genomics Perspective.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Footprints of Worldwide Adaptation in Structured Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Through the Expanded DEST 2.0 Genomic Resource.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Quantification and modeling of turnover dynamics of de novo transcripts in Drosophila melanogaster.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- A natural timeless polymorphism allowing circadian clock synchronization in "white nights".Nature communications · 2022Article
- Drosophila Evolution over Space and Time (DEST): A New Population Genomics Resource.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Differences in temperature-sensitive expression of PcG-regulated genes among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
European and African natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster have been the focus of several studies aiming at inferring demographic and adaptive processes based on genetic variation data. However, in these analyses little attention has been given to gene flow between African and European samples. Here we present a dataset consisting of 14 fully sequenced haploid genomes sampled from a natural population from the northern species range (Umeå, Sweden). We co-analyzed this new data with an African population to compare the likelihood of several competing demographic scenarios for European and African populations and show that gene flow improves the fit of demographic models to data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.