Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376172›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Uptake of provider-initiated HIV and syphilis testing among heterosexual STD clinic patients in Guangdong, China: results from a cross-sectional study.

Peizhen Zhao, Weiming Tang, Huanhuan Cheng, Shujie Huang, Heping Zheng, Bin Yang, Cheng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peizhen Zhao *STD Control Department, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-3744
Weiming TangSTD Control Department, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-707X
Huanhuan ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shujie HuangSTD Control Department, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Heping ZhengSTD Control Department, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin YangSTD Control Department, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng Wang *STD Control Department, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China wangcheng090705@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-9969
Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUnderscreening of HIV and syphilis in clinical settings is pervasive in resource-constrained settings. Heavy patient loads and competing health priorities in these settings inhibit provider's ability to meet screening coverage targets. The objective of this study was to examine determinants of provider-initiated HIV and syphilis testing uptake at sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in China.

designA cross-sectional study was performed between July 2016 and December 2016.

settingSeven STD clinics in Guangdong Province, China.

participantsHeterosexual STD clinic patients met the inclusion criteria, regardless of their interest in receiving HIV or syphilis testing. OUTCOME MEASURES: The syphilis and HIV testing uptake determined by patient receipt of results.

resultsA total of 1943 individuals were recruited in this study. Among those participants, 60.6% (1177/1943) and 74.3% (1443/1943) conducted HIV testing and syphilis testing during the study, respectively, of whom, 2.2% (26/1177) and 21.5% (310/1443) were found to be HIV-positive and syphilis-positive, respectively. The most common reason for rejecting HIV and syphilis testing was a low self-perceived risk of HIV and syphilis infection. After adjusting for covariates, condom use in the last sexual act, consistent condom use in the last 6 months, having paid sex in the last 6 months and having received any kind of HIV/STD-related knowledge during the last 12 years were positively associated with both HIV and syphilis testing uptake.

conclusionsThe low-level of HIV and syphilis testing uptake, alongside with the high-level of engagement in risky sexual behaviours among heterosexual STD clinic patients, warranted a more targeted and intensive behavioural interventions to promote HIV and syphilis testing in this population.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexually Transmitted DiseasesSyphilisChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHeterosexualityHumansSexual BehaviorHIV & AIDSinfection controlpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33376172
PMCPMC7778783
OpenAlexW3115409738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.