Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376171›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

'To be on the safe side': a qualitative study regarding users' beliefs and experiences of internet-based self-sampling for

Maria Grandahl, Margareta Larsson, Björn Herrmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria GrandahlWomen's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden maria.grandahl@kbh.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4553-6656
Margareta LarssonWomen's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Björn HerrmannSection of Clinical Bacteriology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn Sweden, an increasing number of tests for sexually transmitted infections are conducted. Self-sampling services are provided free of charge at the national eHealth website. Our aim was to obtain a deeper understanding of users' beliefs and experiences of

methodsThis qualitative study is part of the national project 'Internet-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea self-sampling test', conducted in Sweden. Individuals ordering a CT/NG self-sampling test at home from the eHealth website were invited to participate. Of the 114 individuals who agreed, a purposeful sample including 20 women and men aged 18-49 years (mean, 30.8 years) participated in a telephone interview in 2019.

resultsThe test service for CT/NG was highly appreciated by men and women of different ages. Round-the-clock accessibility, avoiding clinical visits, ease of use, confidentiality and a rapid test result were reasons for this appreciation. Language, uncertainty about the correct sampling procedure, unreliable postal services and concerns about handling of personal data were mentioned as barriers. Reasons for testing were checking after unprotected sex, symptoms, checking a partner's fidelity or a regular routine-'to be on the safe side'. Knowledge about the infections and their consequences was limited; some considered them severe, especially if they could threaten fertility, and others were less concerned. Disclosing an infection was described as emotionally stressful. Participants had high self-efficacy in relation to the test and would not hesitate to use the service again, even if it involved a cost.

conclusionsInternet-based CT/NG self-sampling at home was highly appreciated and was used for individual health reasons, but also out of concern for others' health and for society as a whole. The benefits seem to outweigh the barriers, and the service may therefore continue to be widely offered.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsGonorrheaAdolescentAdultChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNeisseria gonorrhoeaeSwedenYoung Adultinfectious diseasespublic healthqualitative researchreproductive medicinesexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID33376171
PMCPMC7778762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.