Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376167›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Predictors of electronic cigarette use among Swedish teenagers: a population-based cohort study.

Linnea Hedman, Helena Backman, Caroline Stridsman, Magnus Lundbäck, Martin Andersson, Eva Rönmark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Electronic Cigarettes and Asthma: What Do We Know So Far?Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Alcohol use, cigarette smoking, vaping and number of sexual partners: A cross-sectional study of sexually active, ethnically diverse, inner city adolescents.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linnea HedmanDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Umeå University Faculty of Medicine, Umeå, Sweden linnea.hedman@norrbotten.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1630-3167
Helena BackmanDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Umeå University Faculty of Medicine, Umeå, Sweden.
Caroline StridsmanDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Umeå University Faculty of Medicine, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus LundbäckDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin AnderssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Umeå University Faculty of Medicine, Umeå, Sweden.
Eva RönmarkDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, The OLIN Unit, Umeå University Faculty of Medicine, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SELuleå University of Technology · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to identify predictors of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use among teenagers. DESIGN AND

settingA prospective population-based cohort study of schoolchildren in northern Sweden.

participantsIn 2006, a cohort study about asthma and allergic diseases among schoolchildren started within the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden studies. The study sample (n=2185) was recruited at age 7-8 years, and participated in questionnaire surveys at age 14-15 and 19 years. The questionnaire included questions about respiratory symptoms, living conditions, upper secondary education, physical activity, diet, health-related quality of life, parental smoking and parental occupation. Questions about tobacco use were included at age 14-15 and 19 years. PRIMARY OUTCOME: E-cigarette use at age 19 years.

resultsAt age 19 years, 21.4% had ever tried e-cigarettes and 4.2% were current users. Among those who were daily tobacco smokers at age 14-15 years, 60.9% had tried e-cigarettes at age 19 years compared with 19.1% of never-smokers and 34.0% of occasional smokers (p<0.001). Among those who had tried e-cigarettes, 28.1% were never smokers both at age 14-15 and 19 years, and 14.4% were never smokers among the current e-cigarette users. In unadjusted analyses, e-cigarette use was associated with daily smoking, use of snus and having a smoking father at age 14-15 years, as well as with attending vocational education, physical inactivity and unhealthy diet. In adjusted analyses, current e-cigarette use was associated with daily tobacco smoking at age 14-15 years (OR 6.27; 95% CI 3.12 to 12.58), attending a vocational art programme (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.04 to 4.77) and inversely associated with eating a healthy diet (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92).

conclusionsE-cigarette use was associated with personal and parental tobacco use, as well as with physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and attending vocational upper secondary education. Importantly, almost one-third of those who had tried e-cigarettes at age 19 years had never been tobacco smokers.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSwedenYoung Adultepidemiologypreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33376167
PMCPMC7778771
OpenAlexW3113658522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.