Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33376136›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry

Emerging roles of DYRK2 in cancer.

Vasudha Tandon, Laureano de la Vega, Sourav Banerjee

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular mechanism ofTranslational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Functional Roles of DYRK2 as a Tumor Regulator.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vasudha TandonDivision of Cellular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Laureano de la VegaDivision of Cellular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Sourav BanerjeeDivision of Cellular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.y.banerjee@dundee.ac.uk.
University of Dundee · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22869Cancer Research UK C52419/A22869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, the CMGC kinase DYRK2 has been reported as a tumor suppressor across various cancers triggering major antitumor and proapoptotic signals in breast, colon, liver, ovary, brain, and lung cancers, with lower DYRK2 expression correlated with poorer prognosis in patients. Contrary to this, various medicinal chemistry studies reported robust antiproliferative properties of DYRK2 inhibitors, whereas unbiased 'omics' and genome-wide association study-based studies identified DYRK2 as a highly overexpressed kinase in various patient tumor samples. A major paradigm shift occurred in the last 4 years when DYRK2 was found to regulate proteostasis in cancer via a two-pronged mechanism. DYRK2 phosphorylated and activated the 26S proteasome to enhance degradation of misfolded/tumor-suppressor proteins while also promoting the nuclear stability and transcriptional activity of its substrate, heat-shock factor 1 triggering protein folding. Together, DYRK2 regulates proteostasis and promotes protumorigenic survival for specific cancers. Indeed, potent and selective small-molecule inhibitors of DYRK2 exhibit in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity in triple-negative breast cancer and myeloma models. However, with conflicting and contradictory reports across different cancers, the overarching role of DYRK2 remains enigmatic. Specific cancer (sub)types coupled to spatiotemporal interactions with substrates could decide the procancer or anticancer role of DYRK2. The current review aims to provide a balanced and critical appreciation of the literature to date, highlighting top substrates such as p53, c-Myc, c-Jun, heat-shock factor 1, proteasome, or NOTCH1, to discuss DYRK2 inhibitors available to the scientific community and to shed light on this duality of protumorigenic and antitumorigenic roles of DYRK2.

Indexed as

Dyrk KinasesHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHumansNeoplasmsPhosphorylationPrognosisProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProteostasisTumor Suppressor Protein p53ATP dependent 26S proteaseDyrk KinasesHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHSF1 protein, humanProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53E3 ligasekinase inhibitorphosphorylationproteasomeprotein kinaseproteostasisstress

Identifiers

PMID33376136
PMCPMC7948649
OpenAlexW3113395112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.