Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375999›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2021

A Narrative Review of Sex Differences in Eating Disorders: Is There a Biological Basis?

Kristen M Culbert, Cheryl L Sisk, Kelly L Klump

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bulimia nervosa.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Utilising genomic association data for causal inference in anorexia nervosa.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen M CulbertDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: kculbert@med.wayne.edu.
Cheryl L SiskNeuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Kelly L KlumpDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Michigan State University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

A Twin Study of exogenous hormone exposure and risk for binge eatingR01MH111715 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KLUMP, KELLY L · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
A Twin Study of Androgen Effects on Binge Eating Risk during Puberty in MalesR01MH118848 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CULBERT, KRISTEN, KLUMP, KELLY L · 2019 to 2024
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111715NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEating disorders and their core symptoms (eg, binge eating, body weight/shape concerns) disproportionately affect females, and these sex-differentiated effects become prominent during and after puberty. Although psychosocial influences such as heightened sociocultural pressures for thinness in girls and women contribute to this sex imbalance, biological factors could also play an important role.

methodsThis narrative review summarizes evidence of biological factors underlying the sex-differentiated prevalence of eating pathology as well as within-sex variability in risk.

findingsThere are sex differences in the pubertal emergence of genetic effects on eating pathology (adrenarche in males; gonadarche in females), and at least some genetic contributions to eating pathology seem to vary between the sexes. Furthermore, sex steroid hormones (eg, testosterone, estradiol, progesterone) are leading contributors to differential risk for eating pathology in males and females across the life span. Emerging data suggest that between-sex and within-sex variability in risk might occur via hormone-driven modulation (activation/deactivation) of genetic influences and neural responsiveness to food-related cues. IMPLICATIONS: There is a biological basis to heightened risk for eating pathology in females, relative to males, as well as unique biological influences within each sex. Findings from this review highlight the importance of studying both sexes and considering sex-specific biological mechanisms that may underlie differential risk for eating pathology.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersSex CharacteristicsAnimalsGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansGonadal Steroid Hormonesdevelopmenteating disorderseating pathologygeneticshormonessex difference

Identifiers

PMID33375999
PMCPMC7902379
OpenAlexW3114095057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.