ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Ultrasensitive Materials for Electrochemical Biosensor Labels.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The progress of biomarkers detection to lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Fluorogenic RNA-Based Biosensors of Small Molecules: Current Developments, Uses, and Perspectives.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Challenges and Advances in Biomarker Detection for Rapid and Accurate Sepsis Diagnosis: An Electrochemical Approach.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Point-of-Care Prostate Specific Antigen Testing: Examining Translational Progress toward Clinical Implementation.ACS sensors · 2023Review
- An update on pathogenesis and clinical scenario for Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and treatment.3 Biotech · 2023Review
- Article
- Remote Non-Invasive Fabry-Pérot Cavity Spectroscopy for Label-Free Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recent Progress in Biosensors for Detection of Tumor Biomarkers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Electrochemical Signal Amplification Strategies and Their Use in Olfactory and Taste Evaluation.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Utilizing Electrochemical-Based Sensing Approaches for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples: A Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Advances of MXenes; Perspectives on Biomedical Research.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Detection of the 3-O-CBiosensors · 2022Article
- Emerging materials for the electrochemical detection of COVID-19.Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Promotion of Surgical Masks Antimicrobial Activity by Disinfection and Impregnation with Disinfectant Silver Nanoparticles.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the fabrication of the first electrochemical biosensor by Leland C. Clark in 1956, various labeled and label-free sensors have been reported for the detection of biomolecules. Labels such as nanoparticles, enzymes, Quantum dots, redox-active molecules, low dimensional carbon materials, etc. have been employed for the detection of biomolecules. Because of the absence of cross-reaction and highly selective detection, labeled biosensors are advantageous and preferred over label-free biosensors. The biosensors with labels depend mainly on optical, magnetic, electrical, and mechanical principles. Labels combined with electrochemical techniques resulted in the selective and sensitive determination of biomolecules. The present review focuses on categorizing the advancement and advantages of different labeling methods applied simultaneously with the electrochemical techniques in the past few decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.