Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375577›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2020

Comparison of Circulating Tumour DNA and Extracellular Vesicle DNA by Low-Pass Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Molecular Drivers of Disease in a Breast Cancer Patient.

Olivia Ruhen, Bob Mirzai, Michael E Clark, Bella Nguyen, Carlos Salomon, Wendy Erber, Katie Meehan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. New Perspectives on the Importance of Cell-Free DNA Biology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Advancing Roles of Exosomes in Breast Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Olivia RuhenTranslational Cancer Pathology Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4961-9352
Bob MirzaiTranslational Cancer Pathology Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.
Michael E ClarkMelanoma Research Group, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth 6027, Australia.
Bella NguyenTranslational Cancer Pathology Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.
Carlos SalomonExosome Biology Laboratory, Centre for Clinical Diagnostics, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4474-0046
Wendy ErberTranslational Cancer Pathology Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.
Katie MeehanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-4592
The University of Western Australia · AUChinese University of Hong Kong · HKEdith Cowan University · AUInstitute of Cancer Research · GBThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Ada Bartholomew Trust N/AAustralian Government Research Training Program N/ACancer Council of Western Australia N/AFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico FONDECYT 1170809Lions Medical Research Foundation N/ANational Health and Medical Research Council N/ARichard Walter Gibbon Medical Research Fund N/AThe Medical Research Future Fund N/AZonta Club of Peel N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) as a non-invasive alternative to tumour tissue for the molecular characterisation and monitoring of disease. Recent evidence suggests that cancer-associated changes can also be detected in the DNA contained within extracellular vesicles (EVs). As yet, there has been limited investigation into the relationship between EV DNA and ctDNA, and no studies have examined the EV DNA of breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to use low-pass whole-genome sequencing to identify copy number variants (CNVs) in serial samples of both ctDNA and EV DNA from a patient with breast cancer. Of the 52 CNVs identified in tumour DNA, 36 (69%) were detected in at least one ctDNA sample and 13 (25%) in at least one EV DNA sample. The number of detectable variants in ctDNA and EV DNA increased over the natural history of the patient's disease, which was associated with progression to cerebral metastases. This case study demonstrates that, while CNVs are detectable in patient EV DNA, ctDNA has greater sensitivity than EV DNA for serial monitoring of breast cancer.

Indexed as

biomarkersbreast cancercirculating tumour DNAextracellular vesicle DNAliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33375577
PMCPMC7823926
OpenAlexW3117939526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.