Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375557›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Validation of Zulu Watch against Polysomnography and Actigraphy for On-Wrist Sleep-Wake Determination and Sleep-Depth Estimation.

Jaime K Devine, Evan D Chinoy, Rachel R Markwald, Lindsay P Schwartz, Steven R Hursh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Performance of consumer wrist-worn sleep tracking devices compared to polysomnography: a meta-analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaime K DevineInstitutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5016-6963
Evan D ChinoySleep, Tactical Efficiency, and Endurance Laboratory, Warfighter Performance Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-6654
Rachel R MarkwaldSleep, Tactical Efficiency, and Endurance Laboratory, Warfighter Performance Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0432-3937
Lindsay P SchwartzInstitutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Steven R HurshInstitutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Institutes for Behavior Resources · USLeidos (United States) · USNaval Health Research Center · US

Funding

Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium MTEC-17-08-Multi-Topic-0104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional measures of sleep or commercial wearables may not be ideal for use in operational environments. The Zulu watch is a commercial sleep-tracking device designed to collect longitudinal sleep data in real-world environments. Laboratory testing is the initial step towards validating a device for real-world sleep evaluation; therefore, the Zulu watch was tested against the gold-standard polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy. Eight healthy, young adult participants wore a Zulu watch and Actiwatch simultaneously over a 3-day laboratory PSG sleep study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of epoch-by-epoch data were tested against PSG and actigraphy. Sleep summary statistics were compared using paired samples

Indexed as

ActigraphyPolysomnographySleepWristHumansReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultactigraphylongitudinal data collectionreal-world sleep trackingsleep scoringsleep trackingvalidationwearable device

Identifiers

PMID33375557
PMCPMC7796293
OpenAlexW3113553538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.