Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375515›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Training versus Non-Occlusive Training in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Cristina Bobes Álvarez, Paloma Issa-Khozouz Santamaría, Rubén Fernández-Matías, Daniel Pecos-Martín, Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa, Samuel Fernández-Carnero, Antonio Martínez-Amat, Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristina Bobes ÁlvarezPhysiotherapy Center, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.
Paloma Issa-Khozouz SantamaríaPhysiotherapy Center, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Fernández-MatíasResearch Institute of Physiotherapy and Pain, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-7264
Daniel Pecos-MartínResearch Institute of Physiotherapy and Pain, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-0998
Alexander Achalandabaso-OchoaResearch Institute of Physiotherapy and Pain, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1989-2988
Samuel Fernández-CarneroResearch Institute of Physiotherapy and Pain, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-1627
Antonio Martínez-AmatDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Andalucía, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9652-791X
Tomás Gallego-IzquierdoResearch Institute of Physiotherapy and Pain, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis (KOA) have been shown to have quadriceps muscle weakness and/or atrophy in common. The physiological mechanisms of blood flow restriction (BFR) training could facilitate muscle hypertrophy. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the effects of BFR training on quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA), pain perception, function and quality of life on these patients compared to a non-BFR training. A literature research was performed using Web of Science, PEDro, Scopus, MEDLINE, Dialnet, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library databases. The main inclusion criteria were that papers were English or Spanish language reports of randomized controlled trials involving patients with ACL reconstruction or suffering from KOA. The initial research identified 159 publications from all databases; 10 articles were finally included. The search was conducted from April to June 2020. Four of these studies found a significant improvement in strength. A significant increase in CSA was found in two studies. Pain significantly improved in four studies and only one study showed a significant improvement in functionality/quality of life. Low-load training with BFR may be an effective option treatment for increasing quadriceps strength and CSA, but more research is needed.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionblood flow occlusiveblood flow restricted trainingblood flow restrictionblood flow restriction (BFR)kaatsukneeknee osteoarthritisocclusion training

Identifiers

PMID33375515
PMCPMC7796201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.