Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375488›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Recent Advances on the Anticancer Properties of Saffron (

Andromachi Lambrianidou, Fani Koutsougianni, Irida Papapostolou, Konstantinos Dimas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of Saffron (Integrative cancer therapies
    Pooled it
  2. The Therapeutic Effects ofHealth science reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Epigenomics Nutritional Insights ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Active constituents of saffron (Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andromachi LambrianidouDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.
Fani KoutsougianniDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.
Irida PapapostolouDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.
Konstantinos DimasDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally with an estimated 9.6 million deaths in 2018 and a sustained rise in its incidence in both developing and developed countries. According to the WHO, about 1 in 6 deaths is due to cancer. Despite the emergence of many pioneer therapeutic options for patients with cancer, their efficacy is still time-limited and noncurative. Thus, continuous intensive screening for superior and safer drugs is still ongoing and has resulted in the detection of the anticancer properties of several phytochemicals. Among the spices,

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological AvailabilityClinical Trials as TopicCrocusHumansPatents as TopicPlant ExtractsAntineoplastic AgentsPlant Extractsanticancer activitycancerchemopreventionclinical trialsCrocus sativuspatentssaffron

Identifiers

PMID33375488
PMCPMC7794691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.