Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375481›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

When Land Is Under Pressure Health Is Under Stress.

Aderita Sena, Kristie Ebi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Restoring Coal Mining-Affected Areas: The Missing Ecosystem Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of Factors Associated with the Risk of Suicide in a Brazilian Capital: Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Time, cost and carbon-efficiency: a silver lining of COVID era virtual urology clinics?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aderita SenaCentre of the Study and Research of Health Emergencies and Disasters, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-361, Brazil.
Kristie EbiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-8236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The land provides vital resources to support life on Earth. Land ecosystems services have social, cultural, and spiritual benefits and promote human health and well-being. However, human activities, particularly ongoing unsustainable land practices, are negatively impacting ecosystems through desertification, land degradation and drought (DLDD). This article highlights the pressures and impacts of DLDD on human health through exposure pathways, including water security and safety; sanitation and hygiene; food security and safety; air quality; and soil quality. We describe the impacts on 19 health outcomes in three groups: non-communicable diseases; injuries; and infections, parasitic and nutritional diseases. The magnitude of these health impacts is mediated by social, economic, and health system-related factors. We propose actions for the health sector to respond to the DLDD challenges.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental PollutionClimate ChangeDroughtsHumansSoilSoilclimate changedesertificationdroughtecosystem serviceshealthhuman developmentland degradationsustainable development

Identifiers

PMID33375481
PMCPMC7796245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.