Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375455›Full record

ReviewViruses2020

Invasive Alien Plants in Africa and the Potential Emergence of Mosquito-Borne Arboviral Diseases-A Review and Research Outlook.

Sheila B Agha, Miguel Alvarez, Mathias Becker, Eric M Fèvre, Sandra Junglen, Christian Borgemeister

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sheila B AghaCentre for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Genscheralle 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5480-6865
Miguel AlvarezInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Department of Plant Nutrition, University of Bonn, Karlrobert-Kreiten-Strasse 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1500-1834
Mathias BeckerInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Department of Plant Nutrition, University of Bonn, Karlrobert-Kreiten-Strasse 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Eric M FèvreInternational Livestock Research Institute, Old Naivasha Road, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-4986
Sandra JunglenInstitute of Virology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Free University Berlin, Humboldt-University Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Christian BorgemeisterCentre for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Genscheralle 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-0335
University of Bonn · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) as linked to land-use changes, especially the growing agricultural intensification and expansion efforts in rural parts of Africa, is of growing health concern. This places an additional burden on health systems as drugs, vaccines, and effective vector-control measures against arboviruses and their vectors remain lacking. An integrated One Health approach holds potential in the control and prevention of arboviruses. Land-use changes favour invasion by invasive alien plants (IAPs) and investigating their impact on mosquito populations may offer a new dimension to our understanding of arbovirus emergence. Of prime importance to understand is how IAPs influence mosquito life-history traits and how this may affect transmission of arboviruses to mammalian hosts, questions that we are exploring in this review. Potential effects of IAPs may be significant, including supporting the proliferation of immature and adult stages of mosquito vectors, providing additional nutrition and suitable microhabitats, and a possible interaction between ingested secondary plant metabolites and arboviruses. We conclude that aspects of vector biology are differentially affected by individual IAPs and that while some plants may have the potential to indirectly increase the risk of transmission of certain arboviruses by their direct interaction with the vectors, the reverse holds for other IAPs. In addition, we highlight priority research areas to improve our understanding of the potential health impacts of IAPs.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesPlantsAnimalsArbovirus InfectionsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingCulicidaeEcosystemHumansMosquito Vectorsagricultural expansionagricultural intensificationarboviral disease vectorsinvasive plantsland-use changesLantana camaramosquito ecologyOpuntia ficus-indicaParthenium hysterophoruspathogen transmissionProsopis juliflora

Identifiers

PMID33375455
PMCPMC7823977
OpenAlexW3114138885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.