Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375364›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2020

CRISPR-Cas9: A Powerful Tool to Efficiently Engineer

João Rainha, Joana L Rodrigues, Lígia R Rodrigues

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9-induced gene editing system forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. ACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Effects of CRISPR/Cas9 inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Heterologous production of chondroitin.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
  17. Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

João RainhaCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3963-234X
Joana L RodriguesCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-2320
Lígia R RodriguesCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-0630

Funding

European Regional Development Fund NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004;LISBOA-010145-FEDER-022059Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/BIO/04469/2020; SFRH/BD/138325/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9CRISPR-Cas9 applicationsgenome editingSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID33375364
PMCPMC7823794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.