Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33375106›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Extracellular Matrix Composition Modulates the Responsiveness of Differentiated and Stem Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Lipophilic Derivate of Gemcitabine.

Stefania Forciniti, Elisa Dalla Pozza, Maria Raffaella Greco, Tiago Miguel Amaral Carvalho, Barbara Rolando, Giulia Ambrosini, Cristian Andres Carmona-Carmona, Raffaella Pacchiana, Daria Di Molfetta, Massimo Donadelli and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania ForcinitiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Elisa Dalla PozzaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-5436
Maria Raffaella GrecoDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Tiago Miguel Amaral CarvalhoDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9095-1413
Barbara RolandoDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Giulia AmbrosiniDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-8610
Cristian Andres Carmona-CarmonaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Raffaella PacchianaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Daria Di MolfettaDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Massimo DonadelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9224-9230
Silvia ArpiccoDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Marta PalmieriDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Stephan Joel ReshkinDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9757-5908
Ilaria DandoDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Biochemistry Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6390-4184
Rosa Angela CardoneDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie 813834Joint Project 2017 University of Verona noneMinistero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (MIUR) nonepHioniC - H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018 754345PRIN-2017 "Lioness" from Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR) none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal disease. Gemcitabine (GEM) is used as the gold standard drug in PDAC treatment. However, due to its poor efficacy, it remains urgent to identify novel strategies to overcome resistance issues. In this context, an intense stroma reaction and the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been shown to influence PDAC aggressiveness, metastatic potential, and chemoresistance.

methodsWe used three-dimensional (3D) organotypic cultures grown on an extracellular matrix composed of Matrigel or collagen I to test the effect of the new potential therapeutic prodrug 4-(N)-stearoyl-GEM, called C18GEM. We analyzed C18GEM cytotoxic activity, intracellular uptake, apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy induction in both Panc1 cell line (P) and their derived CSCs.

resultsPDAC CSCs show higher sensitivity to C18GEM treatment when cultured in both two-dimensional (2D) and 3D conditions, especially on collagen I, in comparison to GEM. The intracellular uptake mechanisms of C18GEM are mainly due to membrane nucleoside transporters' expression and fatty acid translocase CD36 in Panc1 P cells and to clathrin-mediated endocytosis and CD36 in Panc1 CSCs. Furthermore, C18GEM induces an increase in cell death compared to GEM in both cell lines grown on 2D and 3D cultures. Finally, C18GEM stimulated protective autophagy in Panc1 P and CSCs cultured on 3D conditions.

conclusionWe propose C18GEM together with autophagy inhibitors as a valid alternative therapeutic approach in PDAC treatment.

Indexed as

ApoptosisAutophagyCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCollagenCollagen Type IDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmExtracellular MatrixHumansLamininNeoplastic Stem CellsOrgan Culture TechniquesPancreatic Neoplasms4-(N)-stearoylgemcitabineCollagenCollagen Type IDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsLamininmatrigelProdrugsProteoglycans3D organotypic culturescancer stem cellschemoresistanceextracellular matrixgemcitabinepancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprodrug

Identifiers

PMID33375106
PMCPMC7792955
OpenAlexW3115772453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.