Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33374913›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Individualised Responsible Artificial Intelligence for Home-Based Rehabilitation.

Ioannis Vourganas, Vladimir Stankovic, Lina Stankovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rehabilitation in long COVID-19: A mini-review.World journal of methodology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioannis VourganasDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3433-3757
Vladimir StankovicDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1075-2420
Lina StankovicDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8112-1976

Funding

Capita 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socioeconomic reasons post-COVID-19 demand unsupervised home-based rehabilitation and, specifically, artificial ambient intelligence with individualisation to support engagement and motivation. Artificial intelligence must also comply with accountability, responsibility, and transparency (ART) requirements for wider acceptability. This paper presents such a patient-centric individualised home-based rehabilitation support system. To this end, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Five Time Sit To Stand (FTSTS) tests evaluate daily living activity performance in the presence or development of comorbidities. We present a method for generating synthetic datasets complementing experimental observations and mitigating bias. We present an incremental hybrid machine learning algorithm combining ensemble learning and hybrid stacking using extreme gradient boosted decision trees and

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceActivities of Daily LivingAdultAlgorithmsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesYoung Adultaccountable artificial intelligenceautomated five time sit to stand testautomated timed up and go testhome-based rehabilitationhybrid ensemble learningpatient-centric individualised rehabilitationresponsible artificial intelligencetransparent artificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID33374913
PMCPMC7792599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.