Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33374645›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Fluctuating NMDA Receptor Subunit Levels in Perirhinal Cortex Relate to Their Dynamic Roles in Object Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation.

Cassidy E Wideman, James Nguyen, Sean D Jeffries, Boyer D Winters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Muscarinic receptor activation overrides boundary conditions on memory updating in a calcium/calmodulin-dependent manner.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Special Issue "Molecular Mechanisms of Memory Formation and Modification".International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cassidy E WidemanDepartment of Psychology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
James NguyenDepartment of Psychology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Sean D JeffriesDepartment of Psychology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Boyer D WintersDepartment of Psychology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 400176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reminder cues can destabilize consolidated memories, rendering them modifiable before they return to a stable state through the process of reconsolidation. Older and stronger memories resist this process and require the presentation of reminders along with salient novel information in order to destabilize. Previously, we demonstrated in rats that novelty-induced object memory destabilization requires acetylcholine (ACh) activity at M

Indexed as

Memory ConsolidationAnimalsMaleMental RecallPerirhinal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateNR2B NMDA receptorReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartateacetylcholineboundary conditionsdestabilizationglutamatememoryreconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID33374645
PMCPMC7793502
OpenAlexW3117001482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.