Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33374504›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Association between Nutrition Policies and Student Body Mass Index.

Marlene B Schwartz, Julien Leider, Juliana F W Cohen, Lindsey Turner, Jamie F Chriqui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marlene B SchwartzRudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, 1 Constitution Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8939-1954
Julien LeiderInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.
Juliana F W CohenDepartment of Public Health and Nutrition, Merrimack College, 315 Turnpike Street, North Andover, MA 01845, USA.
Lindsey TurnerCollege of Education, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Jamie F ChriquiInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-0276
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USBoise State University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Healthy Eating Research, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Prime grant #76655U.S. Department of Agriculture USDA-FNS-OPS-SWP-15-IL-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to concerns about childhood obesity, many US states have implemented policies to limit the sale of unhealthy foods and beverages (e.g., snacks, desserts, and sugary drinks) sold in competition with school meal programs (i.e., competitive foods) in order to improve the nutritional environment of schools and support student health. This study measured state-level competitive food and beverage policies that require foods and beverages sold in à la carte lines, vending machines, and school stores to meet strong nutrition standards and tested the hypothesis that students living in states with stronger laws would have lower body mass index (BMI)-for-age percentiles. BMI data from a national sample of 1625 students attending 284 schools from the School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study were linked to state laws coded as part of the National Wellness Policy Study. A survey-adjusted linear regression model accounting for student and school-level characteristics showed that stronger state nutrition policies were associated with lower student BMI scores (coefficient: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.12, -0.00). Additional models indicated that stronger state policies were significantly associated with fewer unhealthy foods and beverages available in schools. These findings suggest that strong regulations on competitive foods and beverages may lead to improvements in the nutritional quality of the school environment and student BMI. Thus, current federal standards regulating snacks in US schools (i.e., Smart Snacks) are an important element of a comprehensive strategy to improve the school nutrition environment and reduce rates of childhood obesity.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexNutrition PolicyChildFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesitySchool Health ServicesStudentsUnited Stateschildhood obesitycompetitive foodsnutritionschoolschool nutrition policiesstate law

Identifiers

PMID33374504
PMCPMC7822196
OpenAlexW3117438816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.