Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33374322›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Mobile Technologies to Promote Physical Activity during Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.

Florian Meinhart, Thomas Stütz, Mahdi Sareban, Stefan Tino Kulnik, Josef Niebauer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05804500 (Safety and Engagement in Cardiac Rehabilitation With the RecoveryPlus Telerehabilitation Platform), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05804500 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Engagement in Cardiac Rehabilitation With the RecoveryPlus Telerehabilitation Platform: A Prospective, Single-arm, Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNODEHealth FoundationRan2023 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsHeart Diseases, Angina, Stable, Angina Pectoris, Myocardial IschemiaArmsCardiac Telerehabilitation (CTR) via the RecoveryPlus platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian MeinhartLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas StützLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4900-5991
Mahdi SarebanLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan Tino KulnikLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-6713
Josef NiebauerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-9041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoting regular physical activity (PA) and improving exercise capacity are the primary goals of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Mobile technologies (mTechs) like smartphones, smartwatches, and fitness trackers might help patients in reaching these goals. This review aimed to scope current scientific literature on mTechs in CR to assess the impact on patients' exercise capacity and to identify gaps and future directions for research. PubMed, CENTRAL, and CDSR were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These RCTs had to utilize mTechs to objectively monitor and promote PA of patients during or following CR, aim at improvements in exercise capacity, and be published between December 2014 and December 2019. A total of 964 publications were identified, and 13 studies met all inclusion criteria. Home-based CR with mTechs vs. outpatient CR without mTechs and outpatient CR with mTechs vs. outpatient CR without mTechs did not lead to statistically significant differences in exercise capacity. In contrast, outpatient CR followed by home-based CR with mTechs led to significant improvement in exercise capacity as compared to outpatient CR without further formal CR. Supplying patients with mTechs may improve exercise capacity. To ensure that usage of and compliance with mTechs is optimal, a concentrated effort of CR staff has to be achieved. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented lack of patient support while away from institutional CR. Even though mTechs lend themselves as suitable assistants, evidence is lacking that they can fill this gap.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationExerciseHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmartphoneTelemedicinecardiovascular diseasesexercisesmartphonetelemedicinetelerehabilitationtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33374322
PMCPMC7795145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.