Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33374196›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Randomized Controlled Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for GBM Challenged.

Stefaan W Van Gool, Jennifer Makalowski, Simon Fiore, Tobias Sprenger, Lothar Prix, Volker Schirrmacher, Wilfried Stuecker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefaan W Van GoolImmun-Onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Hohenstaufenring 30-32, 50674 Koln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8102-5968
Jennifer MakalowskiImmun-Onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Hohenstaufenring 30-32, 50674 Koln, Germany.
Simon FioreImmun-Onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Hohenstaufenring 30-32, 50674 Koln, Germany.
Tobias SprengerImmun-Onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Hohenstaufenring 30-32, 50674 Koln, Germany.
Lothar PrixBiofocus, Berghäuser Strasse 295, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany.
Volker SchirrmacherImmun-Onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Hohenstaufenring 30-32, 50674 Koln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1253-9145
Wilfried StueckerImmun-Onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Hohenstaufenring 30-32, 50674 Koln, Germany.
Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapies represent a promising strategy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment. Different immunotherapies include the use of checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and vaccines such as dendritic cell vaccines. Antibodies have also been used as toxin or radioactive particle delivery vehicles to eliminate target cells in the treatment of GBM. Oncolytic viral therapy and other immunogenic cell death-inducing treatments bridge the antitumor strategy with immunization and installation of immune control over the disease. These strategies should be included in the standard treatment protocol for GBM. Some immunotherapies are individualized in terms of the medicinal product, the immune target, and the immune tumor-host contact. Current individualized immunotherapy strategies focus on combinations of approaches. Standardization appears to be impossible in the face of complex controlled trial designs. To define appropriate control groups, stratification according to the Recursive Partitioning Analysis classification, MGMT promotor methylation, epigenetic GBM sub-typing, tumor microenvironment, systemic immune functioning before and after radiochemotherapy, and the need for/type of symptom-relieving drugs is required. Moreover, maintenance of a fixed treatment protocol for a dynamic, deadly cancer disease in a permanently changing tumor-host immune context might be inappropriate. This complexity is illustrated using our own data on individualized multimodal immunotherapies for GBM. Individualized medicines, including multimodal immunotherapies, are a rational and optimal yet also flexible approach to induce long-term tumor control. However, innovative methods are needed to assess the efficacy of complex individualized treatments and implement them more quickly into the general health system.

Indexed as

clinical trialdendritic cell vaccinationGBMindividualized multimodal immunotherapymodulated electrohyperthermianewcastle disease virus

Identifiers

PMID33374196
PMCPMC7796083
OpenAlexW3113406573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.