Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33373804›Full record

ArticleHearing research2021

Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.

Chase A Mackey, Jennifer McCrate, Kaitlyn S MacDonald, Jessica Feller, Leslie Liberman, M Charles Liberman, Troy A Hackett, Ramnarayan Ramachandran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chase A MackeyVanderbilt Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, United States. Electronic address: chase.a.mackey@vanderbilt.edu.
Jennifer McCrateInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience for Undergraduates, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, United States. Electronic address: jennifer.c.mccrate@vanderbilt.edu.
Kaitlyn S MacDonaldVanderbilt Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States. Electronic address: kaitlyn.s.macdonald@vanderbilt.edu.
Jessica FellerVanderbilt Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, United States. Electronic address: jessica.feller.1@vanderbilt.edu.
Leslie LibermanEaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary & Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA 02114, United States. Electronic address: Leslie_Liberman@meei.harvard.edu.
M Charles LibermanEaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary & Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA 02114, United States. Electronic address: Charles_Liberman@meei.harvard.edu.
Troy A HackettVanderbilt Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States. Electronic address: troy.a.hackett@vanderbilt.edu.
Ramnarayan RamachandranVanderbilt Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States. Electronic address: ramnarayan.ramachandran@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Training in Fundamental NeuroscienceT32MH064913 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A, WINDER, DANNY G. · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Physiological Signatures and Behavioral Correlates of Hidden Hearing LossR01DC015988 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAMACHANDRAN, RAMNARAYAN, SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Subcortical neural basis of hearing in noiseR01DC011092 · NIDCD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RAMACHANDRAN, RAMNARAYAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011092NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015988NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH064913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is known to have significant consequences for temporal, spectral, and spatial resolution. However, much remains to be discovered about their underlying pathophysiology. This report extends the recent development of a nonhuman primate model of NIHL to explore its consequences for hearing in noisy environments, and its correlations with the underlying cochlear pathology. Ten macaques (seven with normal-hearing, three with NIHL) were used in studies of masked tone detection in which the temporal or spatial properties of the masker were varied to assess metrics of temporal and spatial processing. Normal-hearing (NH) macaques showed lower tone detection thresholds for sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) broadband noise maskers relative to unmodulated maskers (modulation masking release, MMR). Tone detection thresholds were lowest at low noise modulation frequencies, and increased as modulation frequency increased, until they matched threshold in unmodulated noise. NH macaques also showed lower tone detection thresholds for spatially separated tone and noise relative to co-localized tone and noise (spatial release from masking, SRM). Noise exposure caused permanent threshold shifts that were verified behaviorally and audiologically. In hearing-impaired (HI) macaques, MMR was reduced at tone frequencies above that of the noise exposure. HI macaques also showed degraded SRM, with no SRM observed across all tested tone frequencies. Deficits in MMR correlated with audiometric threshold changes, outer hair cell loss, and synapse loss, while the differences in SRM did not correlate with audiometric changes, or any measure of cochlear pathophysiology. This difference in anatomical-behavioral correlations suggests that while many behavioral deficits may arise from cochlear pathology, only some are predictable from the frequency place of damage in the cochlea.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedSpatial ProcessingAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaMacacaNoisePerceptual MaskingModulation masking releaseNoise exposureNonhuman primateSensorineural hearing lossSpatial release from masking

Identifiers

PMID33373804
PMCPMC8487072
OpenAlexW3112720295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.