ArticlePhysical therapy2021
Cognitive Processing Speed Impairment Does Not Influence the Construct Validity of Six-Spot Step Test Performance in People With Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A study of the responsiveness of the Six-Spot Step Test in people with multiple sclerosis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Association of disease outcomes with physical activity in multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.Rehabilitation psychology · 2022Article
- Physical activity and vascular comorbidity in Black and White persons with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.Disability and health journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThere is evidence supporting the construct validity of Six-Spot Step Test (SSST) performance as a functional mobility measure in people with multiple sclerosis (MS); however, it is unknown if cognitive processing speed impairment confounds the construct validity of SSST performance in MS, as this test seemingly requires intact cognitive processing. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of cognitive processing speed impairment on the construct validity and precision of SSST performance as a functional mobility measure in MS.
methodsParticipants (N = 213) completed the SSST, timed 25-foot walk, 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed "Up and Go" Test, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, device-measured steps per day, and Late-Life Function and Disability Inventory, Patient-Determined Disease Steps, and the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test as a cognitive processing speed measure. The overall sample was divided into subsamples with (n = 75) and without (n = 138) cognitive processing speed impairment based on normative Symbol-Digit Modalities Test data. Correlations between SSST performance with other mobility outcomes in the overall sample and cognitive processing speed impairment subsamples were examined and compared. SSST performance was compared relative to other mobility measures for differentiating MS walking function levels in people with and without cognitive processing speed impairment.
resultsSSST performance was significantly and strongly correlated with most mobility outcomes in the overall sample and cognitive processing speed impairment subsamples. The magnitudes of correlations between SSST performance with most mobility outcomes were not statistically different among subsamples. Cognitive processing speed impairment did not diminish the relative precision of SSST performance for differentiating walking function levels.
conclusionThe presence of cognitive processing speed impairment is not a source of invalidity or imprecision when interpreting SSST performance as a functional mobility measure among people with MS. IMPACT: The SSST is a high-quality endpoint for inclusion in interventions targeting mobility in MS, regardless of cognitive processing speed status. This information is critical for rehabilitation research and clinical practice given that mobility and cognitive impairment are highly prevalent, co-occurring, and disabling in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.