Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33373410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

On genetic diversity in caraway: Genotyping of a large germplasm collection.

Daniel von Maydell, Heike Lehnert, Thomas Berner, Evelyn Klocke, Wolfram Junghanns, Jens Keilwagen, Frank Marthe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel von MaydellInstitute for Breeding Research on Horticultural Crops, Institute of Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-1559
Heike LehnertInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Thomas BernerInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Evelyn KlockeInstitute for Breeding Research on Horticultural Crops, Institute of Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-1280
Wolfram JunghannsDr. Junghanns GmbH, Aschersleben, Groß-Schierstedt, Germany.
Jens KeilwagenInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Frank MartheInstitute for Breeding Research on Horticultural Crops, Institute of Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kuehn-Institute, Quedlinburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caraway (Carum carvi) is a widespread and frequently used spice and medicinal plant with a long history of cultivation. However, due to ongoing climatic changes, the cultivation is becoming increasingly risky. To secure caraway cultivation in future, timely breeding efforts to develop adapted material are necessary. Analysis of genetic diversity can accompany this process, for instance, by revealing untapped gene pools. Here, we analyzed 137 accessions using genotyping by sequencing (GBS). Hence, we can report a broad overview of population structure and genetic diversity of caraway. Population structure was determined using a principal coordinate analysis, a Bayesian clustering analysis, phylogenetic trees and a neighbor network based on 13,155 SNPs. Genotypic data indicate a clear separation of accessions into two subpopulations, which correlates with the flowering type (annual vs. biennial). Four winter-annual accessions were closer related to biennial accessions. In an analysis of molecular variance, genetic variation between the two subpopulations was 7.84%. In addition, we estimated the genome size for 35 accessions by flow cytometry. An average genome size of 4.282 pg/2C (± 0.0096 S.E.) was estimated. Therefore, we suggest a significantly smaller genome size than stated in literature.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, PlantGenotypeCarumGenetics, PopulationGenotyping TechniquesPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID33373410
PMCPMC7771672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.