Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33373392›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Computational analysis of the effects of geometric irregularities and post-processing steps on the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel stents.

Lisa Wiesent, Ulrich Schultheiß, Philipp Lulla, Ulf Noster, Thomas Schratzenstaller, Christof Schmid, Aida Nonn, Ashley Spear

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa WiesentComputational Mechanics and Materials Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-4930
Ulrich SchultheißMaterial Science and Surface Analytics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Philipp LullaFIT Production GmbH, Lupburg, Germany.
Ulf NosterMaterial Science and Surface Analytics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas SchratzenstallerMedical Device Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christof SchmidUniversity Hospital Regensburg, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Aida NonnComputational Mechanics and Materials Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ashley SpearDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
OTH Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in additive manufacturing enable the production of tailored lattice structures and thus, in principle, coronary stents. This study investigates the effects of process-related irregularities, heat and surface treatment on the morphology, mechanical response, and expansion behavior of 316L stainless steel stents produced by laser powder bed fusion and provides a methodological approach for their numerical evaluation. A combined experimental and computational framework is used, based on both actual and computationally reconstructed laser powder bed fused stents. Process-related morphological deviations between the as-designed and actual laser powder bed fused stents were observed, resulting in a diameter increase by a factor of 2-2.6 for the stents without surface treatment and 1.3-2 for the electropolished stent compared to the as-designed stent. Thus, due to the increased geometrically induced stiffness, the laser powder bed fused stents in the as-built (7.11 ± 0.63 N) or the heat treated condition (5.87 ± 0.49 N) showed increased radial forces when compressed between two plates. After electropolishing, the heat treated stents exhibited radial forces (2.38 ± 0.23 N) comparable to conventional metallic stents. The laser powder bed fused stents were further affected by the size effect, resulting in a reduced yield strength by 41% in the as-built and by 59% in the heat treated condition compared to the bulk material obtained from tensile tests. The presented numerical approach was successful in predicting the macroscopic mechanical response of the stents under compression. During deformation, increased stiffness and local stress concentration were observed within the laser powder bed fused stents. Subsequent numerical expansion analysis of the derived stent models within a previously verified numerical model of stent expansion showed that electropolished and heat treated laser powder bed fused stents can exhibit comparable expansion behavior to conventional stents. The findings from this work motivate future experimental/numerical studies to quantify threshold values of critical geometric irregularities, which could be used to establish design guidelines for laser powder bed fused stents/lattice structures.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignSelf Expandable Metallic StentsCoronary DiseaseEndovascular ProceduresEquipment DesignFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingStainless SteelStress, MechanicalStainless Steel

Identifiers

PMID33373392
PMCPMC7771678
OpenAlexW3115960039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.