Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33373361›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2020

Association of macro-level determinants with adolescent overweight and suicidal ideation with planning: A cross-sectional study of 21 Latin American and Caribbean Countries.

Christelle Elia, Alexis Karamanos, Alexandru Dregan, Majella O'Keeffe, Ingrid Wolfe, Jane Sandall, Craig Morgan, J Kennedy Cruickshank, Reeta Gobin, Rainford Wilks and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christelle EliaDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8298-8440
Alexis KaramanosDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Alexandru DreganDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7620-4902
Majella O'KeeffeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Ingrid WolfeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4717-7634
Jane SandallSchool of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2000-743X
Craig MorganDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
J Kennedy CruickshankDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8126-1760
Reeta GobinFaculty of Medicine, University of Guyana, Guyana.ORCID 0000-0002-1619-604X
Rainford WilksFaculty of Medicine, University of the West Indies, Jamaica.
Seeromanie HardingDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1964-6656
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Guyana · GYUniversity of the West Indies System · JM

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N015959/1Medical Research Council MR/R022739/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents and young people (10-24 years old) in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region represent approximately 25% of the region's population. Since the 2008 global economic crisis, the pace of reduction in poverty and income inequality in the LAC region has stalled. The region is characterised by high levels of inequities and is also vulnerable to many natural disasters. Food systems are changing with increased availability and marketing of packaged and fast foods and sugar-sweetened drinks. Adolescence is a formative phase of the life course with multiple physical, emotional and social changes which can make them vulnerable to health problems. We assess the potential impact of macro-determinants, human and economic development as well as income inequality, on 2 top-ranking regional priorities for adolescent nutrition and mental health, using measures of overweight and suicidal ideation and planning which some have shown to be associated. METHODS AND

findingsThe Global School-based Health Survey (GSHS) is a nationally representative self-administered, school-based survey. We examined overweight/obesity and suicidal ideation with planning by gross domestic product (GDP) per capita or human development index (HDI) in 10-19-year-old adolescents from 21 LAC countries between 2009 and 2013. Sample sizes varied from 943 in Anguilla to 27,988 in Argentina. A total of 55,295 adolescents had a measure of overweight/obesity status, and 59,061 adolescents reported about suicidal ideation with planning. There was equal representation by sex in the surveys (52% girls and 48% boys). A total of 28.8% of boys and 28.1% of girls had overweight/obesity, and 7.5% of boys and 17.5% of girls reported suicidal ideation with planning over the last 12 months. Adjusted for individual socioeconomic and risk behaviours, and relative to the highest GDP per capita tertile, the middle tertile was associated with 42% (95% confidence interval (CI) 59% to 17%, p = 0.003) and 32% (95% CI 60% to 5%, p = 0.023), and the lowest tertile with 40% (95% CI 55% to 19%, p = 0.001) and 46% (95% CI 59% to 29%, p < 0.001) lower chances of overweight/obesity for girls and boys, respectively. A similar positive effect was seen with HDI, with lowest chances of overweight in the lowest tertile compared with the highest tertile for both sexes. Overweight/obesity was positively related with suicidal ideation with planning for girls (odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.22, p = 0.009) and weakly related for boys (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24, p = 0.182). In contrast to overweight/obesity status, suicidal ideation with planning was not related to macro-level indices despite both outcomes sharing common individual socioeconomic and risk behaviour correlates. Limitations include the dominance of Argentinians in the sample (40%), the exclusion of vulnerable adolescents who dropped out of school, and reporting bias due to stigma of mental health-related issues.

conclusionsThis study shows that economic and human development were positively associated with adolescent overweight/obesity but not with suicidal ideation with planning. We also observed an interconnectedness between overweight/obesity and suicide ideation with planning among girls. These findings highlight the importance of strategies that engage with both upstream and downstream determinants to improve adolescent nutrition and mental health.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorSuicidal IdeationAdolescentAge FactorsCaribbean RegionChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLatin AmericaMaleMental HealthPediatric ObesityRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID33373361
PMCPMC7771665
OpenAlexW3115721089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.