ArticleBiotechnology progress2021
Safety risk management for low molecular weight process-related impurities in monoclonal antibody therapeutics: Categorization, risk assessment, testing strategy, and process development with leveraging clearance potential.
Article in Biotechnology progress, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation into Clearance of Organic Compounds from Biomanufacturing Process Streams during Ultrafiltration/Diafiltration.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Systematic Development of a Detergent Toolbox as an Alternative to Triton X-100.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Product safety aspects of plant molecular farming.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Safety risk management for low molecular weight process-related impurities in monoclonal antibody therapeutics: Categorization, risk assessment, testing strategy, and process development with leveraging clearance potential.Biotechnology progress · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Process-related impurities (PRIs) derived from manufacturing process should be minimized in final drug product. ICH Q3A provides a regulatory road map for PRIs but excludes biologic drugs like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that contain biological PRIs (e.g. host cell proteins and DNA) and low molecular weight (LMW) PRIs (e.g., fermentation media components and downstream chemical reagents). Risks from the former PRIs are typically addressed by routine tests to meet regulatory expectations, while a similar routine-testing strategy is unrealistic and unnecessary for LMW PRIs, and thus a risk-assessment-guided testing strategy is often utilized. In this report, we discuss a safety risk management strategy including categorization, risk assessment, testing strategy, and its integrations with other CMC development activities, as well as downstream clearance potentials. The clearance data from 28 mAbs successfully addressed safety concerns but did not fully reveal the process clearance potentials. Therefore, we carried out studies with 13 commonly seen LMW PRIs in a typical downstream process for mAbs. Generally, Protein A chromatography and cation exchange chromatography operating in bind-and-elute mode showed excellent clearances with greater than 1,000- and 100-fold clearance, respectively. The diafiltration step had better clearance (greater than 100-fold) for the positively and neutrally charged LMW PRIs than for the negatively charged or hydrophobic PRIs. We propose that a typical mAb downstream process provides an overall clearance of 5,000-fold. Additionally, the determined sieving coefficients will facilitate diafiltration process development. This report helps establish effective safety risk management and downstream process design with robust clearance for LMW PRIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.