Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372675›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

Concordance Between Tumor and Germline BRCA Status in High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma Patients in the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 Trial.

Céline Callens, Dominique Vaur, Isabelle Soubeyran, Etienne Rouleau, Pierre-Alexandre Just, Erell Guillerm, Lisa Golmard, Nicolas Goardon, Nicolas Sevenet, Odile Cabaret and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Differential Sensitivity of Germline and SomaticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perspectives on Ovarian Cancer 1809 to 2022 and Beyond.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Céline CallensGenetics Department, Institut Curie and Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3377-4937
Dominique VaurLaboratoire de Biologie Clinique et Oncologique, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Isabelle SoubeyranBiopathology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Etienne RouleauBiopathology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-257X
Pierre-Alexandre JustDepartment of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France, Genetics Department, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Erell GuillermDepartment of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France, Genetics Department, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Lisa GolmardGenetics Department, Institut Curie and Paris Sciences Lettres University, Paris, France.
Nicolas GoardonLaboratoire de Biologie Clinique et Oncologique, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Nicolas SevenetBiopathology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-4279
Odile CabaretBiopathology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2646-6952
Philipp HarterObstetric and Gynecologic Department, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, AGO De, Germany.
Antonio Gonzalez-MartinOncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, formerly MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, GEICO, Spain.
Keiichi FujiwaraGynecologic Oncologic Department, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, GOTIC, Japan.
Sabrina Chiara CecereDepartment of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Mito Italy.
Nicoletta ColomboGynecology Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Mango Italy.
Christian MarthObstetric and Gynecologic Department, Medical University of Innsbruck, AGO Au, Austria.
Ignace VergoteGynecologic Oncologic Department, University Hospital Leuven, Department of Gynecologic oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, BGOG, Belgium.
Johanna MaenpaaGynecologic Oncologic Department, Tampere University and University Hospital Cancer Centre, Tampere, NSGO, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-6912
Eric Pujade-LauraineARCAGY Research, Paris, France.
Isabelle Ray-CoquardMedical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University, Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, GINECO, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-8306
Centre François Baclesse · FRHôpital Cochin · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut Curie · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRArcagy Gineco · FRClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITInnsbruck Medical University · ATIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEKU Leuven · BESaitama Medical University · JPTampere University Hospital · FIUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPAOLA1 is a phase III study assessing olaparib maintenance therapy in advanced high-grade ovarian carcinoma patients responding to first-line platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab as standard of care. Randomization was stratified by treatment outcome and tumor BRCA1/2 status (tBRCA) at screening.

methodstBRCA was tested on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks on 5 French platforms using 2 next-generation sequencing methods based either on hybrid capture or amplicon technology. One of the exploratory objectives was to assess the concordance between germline (gBRCA) and tBRCA testing in French patients. gBRCA testing was performed on blood samples on the same platforms.

resultsFrom May 2015 to July 2017, tBRCA tests were performed for 1176 screened patients. Only 52 (4.4%) tumor samples were noncontributive. The median interval between reception of the tumor sample and availability of the tBRCA status result was 37 days (range = 8-260). A pathogenic variant was reported in 27.1% tumor samples (319 of 1176 screened patients). tBRCA and gBRCA testing were performed for 451 French patients with negative results for both tests in 306 patients (67.8%) and positive results for both tests in 85 patients (18.8%). Only 1 large genomic rearrangement of BRCA1 was detected, exclusively in the blood sample. Interestingly, tBRCA testing revealed 6.4% of pathogenic variant (29 of 451) not detected by gBRCA testing.

conclusionstBRCA testing is an appropriate tool with an acceptable turnaround time for clinical practice and a low failure rate, ensuring reliable identification of patients likely to benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesBevacizumabBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleGerm CellsGerm-Line MutationHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBevacizumabBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinPhthalazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33372675
PMCPMC8246800
OpenAlexW3116934396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.