Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372635›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

DeepFlower: a deep learning-based approach to characterize flowering patterns of cotton plants in the field.

Yu Jiang, Changying Li, Rui Xu, Shangpeng Sun, Jon S Robertson, Andrew H Paterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deep Learning Algorithms Correctly ClassifyFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu JiangHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA.
Changying LiPhenomics and Plant Robotics Center/College of Engineering, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. cyli@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-4797
Rui XuPhenomics and Plant Robotics Center/College of Engineering, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Shangpeng SunPhenomics and Plant Robotics Center/College of Engineering, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Jon S RobertsonCollege of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Andrew H PatersonCollege of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Funding

Cotton Incorporated 17-510GANational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67021-25928NSF Growing Convergent Research 1934481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlowering is one of the most important processes for flowering plants such as cotton, reflecting the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth and is of central importance to crop yield and adaptability. Conventionally, categorical scoring systems have been widely used to study flowering patterns, which are laborious and subjective to apply. The goal of this study was to develop a deep learning-based approach to characterize flowering patterns for cotton plants that flower progressively over several weeks, with flowers distributed across much of the plant.

resultsA ground mobile system (GPhenoVision) was modified with a multi-view color imaging module, to acquire images of a plant from four viewing angles at a time. A total of 116 plants from 23 genotypes were imaged during an approximately 2-month period with an average scanning interval of 2-3 days, yielding a dataset containing 8666 images. A subset (475) of the images were randomly selected and manually annotated to form datasets for training and selecting the best object detection model. With the best model, a deep learning-based approach (DeepFlower) was developed to detect and count individual emerging blooms for a plant on a given date. The DeepFlower was used to process all images to obtain bloom counts for individual plants over the flowering period, using the resulting counts to derive flowering curves (and thus flowering characteristics). Regression analyses showed that the DeepFlower method could accurately (R

conclusionsThe developed approach could thus be an effective and efficient tool to characterize flowering patterns for flowering plants (such as cotton) with complex canopy architecture.

Indexed as

Deep learningFlowering patternHigh-throughput plant phenotypingImage analysis.Object detection

Identifiers

PMID33372635
PMCPMC7720604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.