ArticlePlant methods2020
DeepFlower: a deep learning-based approach to characterize flowering patterns of cotton plants in the field.
Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrastive multi-view representation learning for multi-camera plant phenotyping: A cotton field study.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- BloomSight: An ultra-high-frequency phenotyping framework for diurnal flowering dynamics inPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Central India Medicinal Plant Dataset (CIMPD).Data in brief · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning Applications in Cotton Industry: From Field Monitoring to Smart Processing.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Lightweight highland barley detection based on improved YOLOv5.Plant methods · 2025Article
- HairNet2: deep learning to quantify cotton leaf hairiness, a complex genetic and environmental trait.Plant methods · 2024Article
- The 10-m cotton maps in Xinjiang, China during 2018-2021.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Cotton plant part 3D segmentation and architectural trait extraction using point voxel convolutional neural networks.Plant methods · 2023Article
- A deep learning approach to track Arabidopsis seedlings' circumnutation from time-lapse videos.Plant methods · 2023Article
- Supervised and Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Segmentation and Counting of Cotton Bolls Using Proximal Imagery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Segmentation of structural parts of rosebush plants with 3D point-based deep learning methods.Plant methods · 2022Article
- A Review of High-Throughput Field Phenotyping Systems: Focusing on Ground Robots.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Review
- The field phenotyping platform's next darling: Dicotyledons.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Multi-Information Model for Large-Flowered Chrysanthemum Cultivar Recognition and Classification.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Cotton Breeding in Australia: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- DeepCob: precise and high-throughput analysis of maize cob geometry using deep learning with an application in genebank phenomics.Plant methods · 2021Article
- Global Wheat Head Detection 2021: An Improved Dataset for Benchmarking Wheat Head Detection Methods.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Deep Learning Algorithms Correctly ClassifyFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFlowering is one of the most important processes for flowering plants such as cotton, reflecting the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth and is of central importance to crop yield and adaptability. Conventionally, categorical scoring systems have been widely used to study flowering patterns, which are laborious and subjective to apply. The goal of this study was to develop a deep learning-based approach to characterize flowering patterns for cotton plants that flower progressively over several weeks, with flowers distributed across much of the plant.
resultsA ground mobile system (GPhenoVision) was modified with a multi-view color imaging module, to acquire images of a plant from four viewing angles at a time. A total of 116 plants from 23 genotypes were imaged during an approximately 2-month period with an average scanning interval of 2-3 days, yielding a dataset containing 8666 images. A subset (475) of the images were randomly selected and manually annotated to form datasets for training and selecting the best object detection model. With the best model, a deep learning-based approach (DeepFlower) was developed to detect and count individual emerging blooms for a plant on a given date. The DeepFlower was used to process all images to obtain bloom counts for individual plants over the flowering period, using the resulting counts to derive flowering curves (and thus flowering characteristics). Regression analyses showed that the DeepFlower method could accurately (R
conclusionsThe developed approach could thus be an effective and efficient tool to characterize flowering patterns for flowering plants (such as cotton) with complex canopy architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.