Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372623›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2020

Urban specialization reduces habitat connectivity by a highly mobile wading bird.

Claire S Teitelbaum, Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman, Anjelika Kidd-Weaver, Sonia M Hernandez, Sonia Altizer, Richard J Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A singleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire S TeitelbaumOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. claire.teitelbaum@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5646-3184
Jeffrey Hepinstall-CymermanWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Anjelika Kidd-WeaverWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Sonia M HernandezWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Sonia AltizerOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Richard J HallOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology DEB-1518611National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile animals transport nutrients and propagules across habitats, and are crucial for the functioning of food webs and for ecosystem services. Human activities such as urbanization can alter animal movement behavior, including site fidelity and resource use. Because many urban areas are adjacent to natural sites, mobile animals might connect natural and urban habitats. More generally, understanding animal movement patterns in urban areas can help predict how urban expansion will affect the roles of highly mobile animals in ecological processes.

methodsHere, we examined movements by a seasonally nomadic wading bird, the American white ibis (Eudocimus albus), in South Florida, USA. White ibis are colonial wading birds that forage on aquatic prey; in recent years, some ibis have shifted their behavior to forage in urban parks, where they are fed by people. We used a spatial network approach to investigate how individual movement patterns influence connectivity between urban and non-urban sites. We built a network of habitat connectivity using GPS tracking data from ibis during their non-breeding season and compared this network to simulated networks that assumed individuals moved indiscriminately with respect to habitat type.

resultsWe found that the observed network was less connected than the simulated networks, that urban-urban and natural-natural connections were strong, and that individuals using urban sites had the least-variable habitat use. Importantly, the few ibis that used both urban and natural habitats contributed the most to connectivity.

conclusionsHabitat specialization in urban-acclimated wildlife could reduce the exchange of propagules and nutrients between urban and natural areas, which has consequences both for beneficial effects of connectivity such as gene flow and for detrimental effects such as the spread of contaminants or pathogens.

Indexed as

American white ibis (Eudocimus albus)ConnectivityHabitat specializationNetworkNomadismUrbanizationWildlife

Identifiers

PMID33372623
PMCPMC7720518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.