Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372617›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health systems2020

The use of pasung for people with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Muhamad Taufik Hidayat, Sharon Lawn, Eimear Muir-Cochrane, Candice Oster

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. From Chains to Care: EndingClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcultural psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  6. Indonesia free from pasung: a policy analysis.International journal of mental health systems · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Muhamad Taufik HidayatCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Sharon LawnCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Sharon.lawn@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-8887
Eimear Muir-CochraneCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Candice OsterCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPasung is the term used in Indonesia and a number of other countries for seclusion and restraint of people with mental illness in the community, usually at home by their family. While pasung has been banned because it is contrary to human rights, its practice continues to exist within the community, particularly where community mental health services are limited, and in the absence of adequate social support, and pervasive negatives beliefs about mental illness. It is essential to understand the reasons for the ongoing use of pasung and to examine potential solutions.

methodsA systematic review and narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed international literature was conducted to identify the socio-cultural contexts for pasung use, and interventions to address it. The analysis draws on the socio-ecological framework, which focused on relationships between the individual and their environment.

resultFifty published articles were included in the review; all studies were conducted in Asia and Africa, with 32 undertaken in Indonesia. Most studies were qualitative (n = 21). Others included one case-control study, one cross-sectional study, and seven surveys; only four studies examined the application of an intervention, and each used a pre and post methodology. Of these, two studies tested psychoeducational interventions which aimed to overcome family burden due to pasung, and each suggested a community mental health approach. The remaining two studies evaluated the intervention of 'unlocking'; one study used a community-based culturally sensitive approach, and the other used a community-based rehabilitation program. Reasons for pasung given by family appear to be as a last resort and in the absence of other supports to help them care for the person with severe mental illness.

conclusionThe findings highlight that a mixture of individual, interpersonal, community and policy interventions are needed to reduce the use of pasung. While consumer and carer involvement as part of a socio-ecological approach is understood to be effective in reducing pasung, an understanding of how to elaborate this in the management of pasung remains elusive. Review Registration CRD42020157543: CRD.

Indexed as

Community mental healthHuman rightsLived experienceNarrative synthesisPasungRestraintSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33372617
PMCPMC7720453
OpenAlexW3111350334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.