Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372607›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Template-based prediction of protein structure with deep learning.

Haicang Zhang, Yufeng Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protein foundation models: a comprehensive survey.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. AI-Driven Deep Learning Techniques in Protein Structure Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current Approaches in Supersecondary Structures Investigation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haicang ZhangDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. hz2529@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6268-4258
Yufeng ShenDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. ys2411@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

OMOP information model for eMERGE phenotypingU01HG008680 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 2015 to 2026
$13.3M
Integrate cancer genomics data in geneticstudies and diagnosis of developmental disordersR01GM120609 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHEN, YUFENG · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Integrate gene expression data to characterize the contribution of rare genetic risk factors to structural birth defectsR03HL147197 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHEN, YUFENG · 2019 to 2020
$315k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008680NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL147197NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of protein structure is fundamentally important to understand biological function of proteins. Template-based modeling, including protein threading and homology modeling, is a popular method for protein tertiary structure prediction. However, accurate template-query alignment and template selection are still very challenging, especially for the proteins with only distant homologs available.

resultsWe propose a new template-based modelling method called ThreaderAI to improve protein tertiary structure prediction. ThreaderAI formulates the task of aligning query sequence with template as the classical pixel classification problem in computer vision and naturally applies deep residual neural network in prediction. ThreaderAI first employs deep learning to predict residue-residue aligning probability matrix by integrating sequence profile, predicted sequential structural features, and predicted residue-residue contacts, and then builds template-query alignment by applying a dynamic programming algorithm on the probability matrix. We evaluated our methods both in generating accurate template-query alignment and protein threading. Experimental results show that ThreaderAI outperforms currently popular template-based modelling methods HHpred, CNFpred, and the latest contact-assisted method CEthreader, especially on the proteins that do not have close homologs with known structures. In particular, in terms of alignment accuracy measured with TM-score, ThreaderAI outperforms HHpred, CNFpred, and CEthreader by 56, 13, and 11%, respectively, on template-query pairs at the similarity of fold level from SCOPe data. And on CASP13's TBM-hard data, ThreaderAI outperforms HHpred, CNFpred, and CEthreader by 16, 9 and 8% in terms of TM-score, respectively.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that with the help of deep learning, ThreaderAI can significantly improve the accuracy of template-based structure prediction, especially for distant-homology proteins.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSequence Analysis, ProteinAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareProteinsDeep learningDeep residual neural networkProtein structure predictionProtein threading

Identifiers

PMID33372607
PMCPMC7771081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.