ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Treatment With Cardiovascular Medications: Prognosis in Patients With Myocardial Injury.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics, clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled or not enrolled in a quality registry.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Article
- Sleeping Medications and Prevention of Functional Disability in Older Adults with Low Care Needs: A Prospective Cohort Study.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Assessing the effectivity of counting the number of teeth with their conditions to predict mortality: the OHSAKA study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Distinct cardiac troponin alterations in patients with cocaine and alcohol use disorders during abstinence for cardiovascular risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Bioinformatics-based Analysis and Verification of Chromatin Regulators and the Mechanism of Immune Infiltration Associated with Myocardial Infarction.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Type 2 myocardial infarction: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in contemporary cardiology.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Associations of kidney tests at medical facilities and health checkups with incidence of end-stage kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Treatment With Cardiovascular Medications: Prognosis in Patients With Myocardial Injury.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Adding Insult to Injury: Are There Treatments for Myocardial Injury and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- A review on the molecular basis underlying the protective effects ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background There is no clinical guidance on treatment in patients with non-ischemic myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI). Methods and Results In a cohort of 22 589 patients in the emergency department at Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden during 2011 to 2014 we identified 3853 patients who were categorized into either type 1 myocardial infarction, T2MI, non-ischemic acute and chronic myocardial injury. Data from all dispensed prescriptions within 180 days of the visit to the emergency department were obtained concerning β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, statins, and platelet inhibitors. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI for all-cause mortality in relationship to the number of medications (categorized into 0-1 [referent], 2-3 and 4 medications) in the groups of myocardial injury. In patients with T2MI, treatment with 2 to 3 and 4 medications was associated with a 50% and 56% lower mortality, respectively (adjusted HR [95% CI], 0.50 [0.25-1.01], and 0.43 [0.19-0.96]), while corresponding associations in patients with acute myocardial injury were 24% and 29%, respectively (adjusted HR [95% CI], 0.76 [0.59-0.99] and 0.71 [0.5-1.02]), and in patients with chronic myocardial injury 27% and 37%, respectively (adjusted HR [95% CI], 0.73 [0.58-0.92] and 0.63 [0.46-0.87]). Conclusions Patients with T2MI and non-ischemic acute or chronic myocardial injury are infrequently prescribed common cardiovascular medications compared with patients with type 1 myocardial infarction. However, treatment with guideline recommended drugs in patients with T2MI and acute or chronic myocardial injury is associated with a lower risk of death after adjustment for confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.