Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372364›Full record

ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2021

Prevalence and predictors of suicidality and non-suicidal self-harm among individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Results from a community-recruited sample.

Kate Haining, Olga Karagiorgou, Ruchika Gajwani, Joachim Gross, Andrew I Gumley, Stephen M Lawrie, Matthias Schwannauer, Frauke Schultze-Lutter, Peter J Uhlhaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kate HainingInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4500-1395
Olga KaragiorgouInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Ruchika GajwaniInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-320X
Joachim GrossInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Andrew I GumleyInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Stephen M LawrieDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Matthias SchwannauerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Frauke Schultze-LutterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-9574
Peter J UhlhaasInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0892-2224

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011689/1Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSuicidal thoughts and behaviours are prevalent in individuals with schizophrenia. However, research examining the prevalence and predictors of suicidality and self-harm in participants at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is limited and mostly focuses on help-seeking participants recruited through clinical pathways. The current study sought to assess the prevalence of suicidality and self-harm and identify predictors of current suicidal ideation in community-recruited CHR-P participants.

methodsData were available for 130 CHR-P participants, 15 participants with first-episode psychosis (FEP), 47 participants not fulfilling CHR-P criteria (CHR-Ns) and 53 healthy controls. Current and lifetime suicidality and self-harm were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of current suicidal ideation in the CHR-P group.

resultsA considerable proportion of CHR-P participants disclosed current suicidal ideation (34.6%). Overall, FEP individuals were at greatest risk, with considerably high prevalence rates for current suicidal ideation (73.3%), lifetime self-harm behaviour (60.0%) and lifetime suicide attempt (60.0%). In the CHR-P sample, current suicidal ideation was predicted by lifetime suicide attempts, lower CAARMS severity, impaired social functioning and greater comorbidity.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that suicidality and self-harm are highly prevalent in community-recruited CHR-P and FEP individuals. Accordingly, these results highlight the importance of further research into the determinants of suicidality and self-harm during at-risk and early stages of psychosis, and the implementation of intervention strategies to reduce adverse outcomes in these populations.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicideHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSuicidal IdeationSuicide, Attemptedclinical high-riskfirst-episode psychosispsychosisself-harmsuicidality

Identifiers

PMID33372364
PMCPMC8451831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.